貼文的作者是 Martin Dougiamas

Core developers的相片 Documentation writers的相片 Moodle HQ的相片 Particularly helpful Moodlers的相片 Plugin developers的相片 Testers的相片
Hmm ... sorry but I can see a problem with "External Activity" is that it might get confused with the new Simple LTI stuff coming down the pipe ... LTI is clearly more about arbitrary external activities and is also more standards based.

More info here on Pigui's blog: http://blogs.dfwikilabs.org/pigui/

I do like "External Quiz" (externalquiz) the best so far for a default name. Remember people can rename it locally using a custom language if it doesn't work for them ...
Core developers的相片 Documentation writers的相片 Moodle HQ的相片 Particularly helpful Moodlers的相片 Plugin developers的相片 Testers的相片
The main criteria for ongoing evaluation of Partners is direct feedback from customers to the moodle.com helpdesk (http://moodle.com/helpdesk). If you or anyone you know has a problem with a particular Moodle Partner please let us know and we'll look into the situation and do our best to sort it out.

I take this aspect very seriously, however I can see this is not so obvious on moodle.com and I'll make sure we fix that soon. Thanks for raising the issue!
Core developers的相片 Documentation writers的相片 Moodle HQ的相片 Particularly helpful Moodlers的相片 Plugin developers的相片 Testers的相片
Hi Frances,

Ray and A.T. have provided some good answers already, but let me just reiterate.

We look at a lot of factors when assessing applications from unknown companies wanting to become partners. The record of contributions in the forums, tracker and docs is one way to assess their knowledge and interest in Moodle, so during the application process we usually ask for the names of people in the company who have been involved on moodle.org (if we don't already know them) and we research those contributions.

We have never had a requirement for ongoing posting in the forums by the CEO of these companies or any of the employees, that would be a little ridiculous. Many of them do and that is fantastic, obviously I would prefer that where possible, but the main thing (for them to be running a good service) is obviously that they are at least keeping up to date with new developments by reading discussions, release notes, news etc as necessary.

We also have our own internal Partner forums with more news (one of the advantages of being a partner), as well as all kinds of conferences and meetings where we discuss new developments. Often they will have one or more staff members tasked to keeping up with this sort of thing. Many of them also have developers who are very active in the tracker and docs but don't post a lot on the forums.