Hi everyone!
I wish the above (CLOZE in Lessons) was not considered a 'bug'.
There are situations where a number of sub-questions reference the same situation (e.g. x-y coordinates of a vector/point, individual and sum displacements during superposition of waves, displacement and average velocity from a velocity-time graph, etc. etc...), where asking 'one question at a time' creates an unnatural situation:
a. it forces the author to repeat the details of the set-up (to which the sub-questions refer) over and over again, which in turn
b. confuses/wastes time of the learner: "do I need to re-analyse the details of the situation, or is it the same as in the last question?"
Expecting questions of the Multi-Input type ( http://www.open.edu/openlearnworks/mod/oucontent/view.php?id=52747§ion=2.4 ) to be available in Lessons may be too much at present, but CLOZE questions can serve as a functional substitute for the time being.
Thank you (readers) for taking the time to consider this, regardless of the outcome.
P.S. It strikes me, from reading this and other related discussions, that some folks do, others do not subscribe to the notion that 'assessment' and 'learning' are separate events, requiring separate structures and functions. I belong to the latter, and am using Quizzes to simultaneously promote learning ('problem-based' learning: randomized questions, multiple attempts, fractional penalties) and to assess. The only drawbacks of Quizzes at present (in my case, 2.5) imho are their (a) linear structure and (b) independence, whereas Lessons offer jumps and pre-conditions. That is why I'd like to see either Lessons expand their repertoire of question types, or for Quizzes to incorporate branches/pre-conditions i.e. a melding of both. ('Descriptive' questions in Quizzes, after all, can already easily duplicate the 'lecturing' parts of Lessons and Books.)