GB,
Thank you for your lesson on flaming. But in the case of the first post, I think "using one's ignorance as a basis for instructing someone else to change their system" is a perfect description of what happened. The guy admittedly didn't know of anyone using MSSQL Server with Moodle, and that is a form of ignorance, which just means not knowing something, and there is nothing wrong with that. We are all ignorant of almost everything there is to know, of which there are an infinite number of things, and we can only know a finite number. But to tell someone else they need to make major changes because of that is using that ignorance as a basis for instructing others, and in this case it turned out to be false instruction, and that's what I found outrageous.
You may have noticed that, around the time of my last post to you, JH sent another post addressed to me. I wasn't planning on doing any more posting, but I had to respond to that one. I hope you agree that I calmly and civilly addressed his issues, and explained what I meant. I also confessed my own ignorance (that I am not a Moodle expert) which, unlike him, I am not willing to use as a basis for instruction.
Your suggestion as to what I should have said is something I could not have said because it contains facts I did not know at the time without doing further research. I didn't want to take the time to do that because, as I said before, I wanted to correct a grievous piece of wrong advice before someone went to (potentially) a lot of trouble changing their system environment, learning a new database manager, etc., unnecessarily. The only research I did was to find the reference to the Moodle doc page on MSSQL Server in the January post from KW, as I mentioned before, so I could show it to JH. At the time he and I had both understood that AC was using that database server, and even now as far as I know he is, because he said so. I also mentioned in my previous post to you that I hadn't noticed that this requires a PHP extension he doesn't have until after my first post, although I admit it would have been a good educated guess. Again, time was of the essence.
You are probably right about my use of "beyond me" to KW being a little disrespectful, but what I was saying is that it wasn't anywhere near as "combative" as my post to JH, which I think was appropriately so, for the reasons I have stated.
And last and probably least, your suggested post seemed to be addressed to both JH and KW. I was originally going to use a single post, but the problem was that their posts were on different branches of the thread tree. There didn't seem to be any place to put a single post where they were both sure to see it, so I used two separate ones.
RLE