Does anyone have licensing costs for 20,000 students for WebCT and Blackboard at hand?
A list of this info (for various numbers of students) would, I think, be quite handy for those trying to persuade the powers that be to go with Moodle.
I dislike the fact they don't seem to have at least ball park figures on their websites
Regards
Harry
If people feel shy about publishing their numbers, perhaps they could message Harry privately and he could compile an anonymous table here for us all to refer to.
I think we'll need to know: country, education sector, number of students, price per year.
More than happy to set up a table as per Martin's suggestion if people feel like sharing this information.
Regards
Harry
Here are some published costs and the sources:
Webct: up to 6000 Seats (User/course) for one year incl german language plugin Campus Edition Focus 15.000 US $ (http://www.e-teaching.org/technik/produkte/webctsteckbrief)
Blackboard
* Blackboard 5 Level One (Course Manager): ca. 5.000 US $ pro Server/year
* Blackboard 5 Level Two (Course und Portal Manager): ca. 25.000 US $ pro Server pro Jahr
* Blackboard 5 Level Three (Advanced Course und Portal Manager): ca. 50.000 US $ pro Produktionsserver pro Jahr plus Gebühren für on-time Integration
incl. 25.000 user/year. (http://www.e-teaching.org/technik/produkte/blackboardsteckbrief)
Some more sources:
http://www.spectatornews.com/news/2004/02/02/CampusNews/Desire2learn.To.Replace.Webct.Blackboard-594170.shtml
http://www.cvc4.org/newscopy/Current_Events/may_update.asp
http://www.siena.edu/cot/resources/COURSEWARE%20COMPARISON%203.html
http://newark.rutgers.edu/~natalieb/CMSsummary.htm
http://64.233.183.104/search?q=cache:0TvZDqDY7sYJ:www.wit.ie/library/plans%26policies/vles.htm+costs+webct+blackboard&hl=de&client=firefox-a
Ralf
Length of contract and version details are very important too.
WebCT Vista for example seems to be around an order of magnitude more expensive than their legacy codebase WebCT Campus. They are currently backporting a great deal of functionality from Vista with the aim of totally replacing the current Campus technology. After their customers panicked they issued a statement that the Campus price-point would still remain even after they have totally replaced the codebase. However the rather radical changes to the underlying codebase mean you will now need, for WebCT version 6 an Oracle or MS SQL server licence and associated hardware and technical support.
The length of contract is important too as they generally try to lock you in for long periods but the price can rise dramatically when you come to renew the contract (I've been told recently of 30%-40% increases, not including the newer database licences)
I've kind of lost track of what Blackboard is doing but I believe they still do the same thing as WebCT whereby they limit the amount of integration you can do unless you pay a fair bit extra. When I last looked in detail at this the price would double or triple if you wanted the system to integrate with your student records database (i.e. that's not counting the consulting and development costs, just a cost for even being permitted to do it).
So I think to be truly useful the table should include the version (in as much detail as possible), how long the contract was for, and when the deal was done.
For 20,000, the basic license probably won't be available, and you'll have to choose between hosted (ASP) or enterprise. Enterprise used to start at ~$60,000, but there are per/student fees and other issues, and I think it's ranging ~$100,000/year now.
Not sure about WebCT CE, I think they are in the range of $10,000/year. From what I've heard of Vista, it's at least $100,000 year and more than that for most campusses.
This is something that would be nice feature of the edutools comparison site, IMO.
BB basic for approx. 1400 users, software only, no SSL, we run our own server (linux). $9500 USD. You get any software upgrades/patches released during the academic year and basic support (which we have only used once in 4 years). If you want "building blocks", third party partner add-ons, that is additional.
License Renewal
Blackboard Learning System Basic
September 2005 - August 2006
$9500
Looks to me like they have quite a few variations here. Reminds me of trying to buy a car! Sigh.
atw
- Students could not unenroll themselves up until the version of last year
- Now a self-unenroll options exists but is turned off by default - the teacher has to turn it on. The problem is that the teachers that don't bother to unenroll the students at the end of a course also don't bother turning this option on
- I've heard from one teacher that there is no way to mass-unenroll the students - you have to take them out ONE AT A TIME!!! Argh!
I could ask what my university pays, I've heard figures of over 20.000 euro but I am not sure. I'll see if I can get some figures.
This might help a little: http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0LSH/is_4_5/ai_95447612
Excerpt: The University of South Dakota system--a WebCT customer--may end up paying a whopping $275,000 to serve 25,000 students in its state system-up from $60,000, says Warren Wilson, director of Regent Information Systems.
-- Art
My apologies but work commitments have kept me away. Will set a table up and post it later today.
Regards
Harry
Sorry for posting this late. I dug this up from my computer files.
"......
WebCT, or World Wide Web Course Tools, is was originally a Canadian product originally developed at the University of British Columbia in 1995, as part of a research project to study the impact of online learning on student outcomes, out of a desire to enhance and enrich the learning experience through new technologies. Today, it is used by 10 million students at over 2,500 universities and colleges in 80 countries, and is described as having "revolutionized the way people teach and learn" (UBC, 2004). In 1999, the WebCT interest merged with Universal Learning Technologies of Massachusetts, and has offices in Canada, the US, and Australia. In the process, the product's mission has expanded from serving purely educational purposes to providing "enterprise-wide" learning management solutions in all areas of e-learning and training. Today, the WebCT Campus Edition (CE) is claimed by its vendor to be a "global market-leading Course Management System (CMS)" (WebCT website, 2004). The WebCT Vista Academic Enterprise edition is the latest version. One WebCT user, the New Mexico State University, indicates (2003), that the company:
The system provides many tools for content creation and delivery within individual courses. The CE is designed to support single institution use with limited customization and branding capabilities. It is scalable and supports integration with campus portals based on JASIG's uPortal framework a variety of portals and other campus systems.
In seeking to compare the CE with the new Vista, however, the current evaluation team was unable to obtain unrestricted access despite attempting to do so via correspondence lasting several weeks ran into a problem of access. A previous report in the current series, by Fahy (Report #10), refers to "the right to pilot-test", and states that "Evaluators should have access to a choice of reference sites". Obtaining such access in order to evaluate WebCT, however, is evidently no simple matter. The company's online demos of the CE provide a very limited view of the product's capabilities. The user is led through a series of mini-tutorials which stress how easy it is to personalize, create, customize and evaluate student learning in CE. Due the highly directed nature of these demos, however, it is difficult to assess the product's general usability. A number of exemplary courses are made available on the product website, giving some insight into this from the student perspective, though not from that of the teacher/ course developer. More extensive student evaluation than this appears not to be facilitated, although the vendor does appear interested in enabling trials of the system by institutions formally interested in adopting it. This restricted accessibility made it difficult for the current team to evaluate the two WebCT products fully, and from the point of view of the six ASTD evaluation criteria used in previous reports in this series: cost, complexity, control, clarity, common technical framework, and features. The report presents a general comparison of the two product versions, therefore, based on online descriptions of them rather than on direct first-hand experience.
Source is here:
http://www.irrodl.org/content/v5.3/technote6.html
My favorite quote comes from a response from WebCT User Community Relations Director, Dr. D.J. Volchuk:
WebCT Vista and Campus Edition are competitively priced in the market place. The various products and license offerings including Campus Edition, Vista Core and Vista Enterprise are specifically tailored to meet the needs of institutions of all sizes not just large educational and training institutions with huge budgets. WebCT Standard Edition has not been available since 2003. WebCT Campus Edition version 6.0 will be released in spring 2005, and will continue to meet the needs of our Campus Edition customers for years to come.
WebCT has been extremely flexible in developing pricing models to meet the needs of our customers. Pricing has remained flat for Vista since its release in 2002. Campus Edition increases have ranged from 7 percent - 10 percent per year, and WebCT offers customers the option of multi-year contracts that lock in prices over the contract period.
WebCT has ALWAYS incorporated the feedback of our customers into the product. There are several very active WebCT Advisory Boards who provide us with specifically this type of input, as well as a suggestion box at the website, and input through all of the WebCT representatives who regularly visit our customers campuses.
WebCT is financially sound and strong and certainly not in the throes of its last hurrah.
State of New Mexico WebCT Vista Academic Enterprise System
Another document here, already a couple of years old:
http://www.wcu.edu/it/cio/planning/cmsfinalreport.pdf
My humble apologies on such a tardy response, unfortunately my "real" work has kept me away until now.
Thanks to everyone that has supplied information
It does seem to be extremely difficult pinning costs down due to the amount of variables and deals that seem to be done. What I tried to do was extract some info from the posts above and collate it based on recent (post 2003) costs that are reliable (my apologies if I missed anyone out, not implying lack of reliability just my lack of attention!). As there may well be issues of confidentiality I put down actual costs from people here as "A Moodler".
Not as comprehensive as I would wish but at least a start:
Source |
Cost/yr |
Students |
Platform |
Country |
When |
Extra cost/comments |
A moodler |
US$9500 |
1400 |
Blackboard basic |
USA |
2005-2006 |
|
A moodler |
US$7000 |
7500 |
Blackboard basic |
USA |
2005 |
SSL = US$4000; MS SQL = US$0.75/user |
US$15,000 |
6000 |
WebCT Campus Focus |
Germany |
? |
Incl German plugin |
|
http://www.e-teaching.org/technik/produkte/blackboardsteckbrief |
US$5000 US$25,000 US$50,000 |
? ? ? |
Blackboard 5 Level 1 Blackboard 5 Level 2 Blackboard 5 Level 3 |
Germany
|
? |
|
US$3.3 million + US$4/student |
? |
Ball park figures for a version of BB and WebCT over a five year period |
USA |
2004 |
"When evaluating the cost, we considered license fee, plus five years maintenance, plus installation costs," |
|
US$1000 US$2000 US$4000 US$6000
US$7500 US$15,000
US$3750 US$7500 |
100 200 400 600
3000 6000
25 courses unlimited courses |
WebCT level 1
WebCT Campus Focus
Blackboard (?) |
USA |
2003-2004 |
Does not include hosting costs |
|
http://www.siena.edu/cot/resources/COURSEWARE%20COMPARISON%203.html |
US$4000
US$15,000
US$10,000
US$5000
US$25,000
US$50,000 |
Unlimited
Unlimited?
Support
?
?
? |
WebCT basic
WebCT Campus
WebCT
Blackboard Level 1
Blackboard Level 2
Blackboard Level 3 |
USA |
? |
Support for 1 Admin
Support for 1 Admin
Premium support
Course manager only
CM + Portal Manager
Advanced CM + PM |
US$60,000
US$90,000
US$50,000 |
?
?
? |
Web CT
Web CT Vista
Blackboard (?) |
USA |
2004 |
17,137 students using it
13.122 students using it |
I hope it proves usefull to some, for my part, doesn't matter, have convinced the powers that be to run a 12 month trial and am in the process of setting the site up now so be warned . . . may be a few questions to the community soon!
Sorry about that
I received a notice today (8-19-05) that indicated that our BB license would be $12,500 USD next August. They do let us know a year in advance so we can budget properly. We are <1400 size school with Level 1 Basic licensing, host on our own server, no SSL or other components installed.
atw
The costs in the table are US $.
Been a while so chances are it's out of date now but hope it's still useful with the subsequent posts.
Regards
Harry
Great to get ballpark figures.
Michael
Excellent reference! Thanks!
Does anyone have any more recent numbers on these costs and fees? These are a bit outdated, 4-6 years old now...
Any thoughts will be greatly appreciated!
Joe
Needless to say, this is a windfall incentive for our region to consider a full adoption of Moodle. This, coupled with Blackboard's polite refusal to take into account the needs of the K-12 user community will make arguing the case for Moodle like shooting fish in a barrel.
Our school, with app. 80,000 students, pays about 50-60k a year, prior to the announced 30% price increase. This was a deciding factor in putting out moodle as an alternate platform. We are pushing to do this at the state level as well.
We run BB on about 7 boxes... there's a load balancer, 4 front-end boxes, and 2 DB servers. I suppose there are additional fees for SQL Server on the back-end, but I'm not in admin so don't know the details there.
FWIW, once you get past about 10k a year, I see a move to moodle as a no-brainer. 10k will get you a lot of consulting from the moodle community, and hosting is cake by comparison to BB.
d.i.