I was one of the persons who had favoured that this discussion should be 'closed' but never 'removed'.
In fact Joseph and i had exchanged a few ideas about this. I thought it was losing relevance so I chipped in my view (which, in the spirit of open forum, was neither meant to be subscribed by anyone nor could anyone question my right to express my view that it should be closed. It was simply my opinion, nothing more nothing less)
and even i recieved that message which i thought was a case of banging the stick when the snake had already disappeared into the hole.
I feel it should be available for viewing for everyone. Why through google? we ain't thieves to use a backdoor entry.
Dr S Bhatia
Missatges enviats per Dr S Bhatia
version of moodle please.
how long ago was it installed.
we had discussed that if students are unenroled, their data is not deleted from database. so that also causes a burgeoning database sometimes (but not obviously in this case)
how long ago was it installed.
we had discussed that if students are unenroled, their data is not deleted from database. so that also causes a burgeoning database sometimes (but not obviously in this case)
I have thought deeply about this.
it'd make sense if we test them for different things in one question.
for e.g.
it'd make sense if we test them for different things in one question.
for e.g.
Name two oral dosage forms. one liquid :{1:SHORTANSWER:~=syp*~=gel*~=suspension*~=dispersible tablet*~=solution*#} and and one solid {1:SHORTANSWER:~=tablet*~=cap*~=lozenge*~=granule*~=powder*#}
You cant use two similar boxes.
students will write the same answer in both and get away with it.
see the discussion here (with you?)
students will write the same answer in both and get away with it.
see the discussion here (with you?)
haha
David, Now watch the fun in this screen shot.
I created this question by your code. Can you spot whats wrong with it?
David, Now watch the fun in this screen shot.
I created this question by your code. Can you spot whats wrong with it?