Forumindlæg af Howard Miller

Billede af Core developers Billede af Documentation writers Billede af Particularly helpful Moodlers Billede af Peer reviewers Billede af Plugin developers
I think he's saying (sorry if I'm picking you up wrongly, Petr) that if your code hasn't been through HQ's checks and balances then you're not trusted. That means nearly all optional plugins. I don't find this surprising... not all developers are motivated to take that sort of time. It's even worse if those plugins then include other libraries from unverified sources.

I am not a security expert.
Billede af Core developers Billede af Documentation writers Billede af Particularly helpful Moodlers Billede af Peer reviewers Billede af Plugin developers
Personally... I'd strongly recommend not doing that. Grading Assignments moves through various states and it's much better to create a new activity for each Assignment. I'm not saying that what you're attempting isn't possible, it just goes against how (as far as I can tell) Assignment was designed to be used.
Billede af Core developers Billede af Documentation writers Billede af Particularly helpful Moodlers Billede af Peer reviewers Billede af Plugin developers
So which version are you running in production now? Do you still have the problem. If it can be avoided, don't upgrade a site with a mysterious problem - the risk of making it even worse is ever present. Expecially (as has been pointed out) with 5.1 thrown into the mix.