If I had it I would just redirect it to http://moodle.com
The restrictions are purely on things that would conflict with http://moodle.com, so there is a lot of other uses you could put it to.
If you have particular ideas that you would like us to check, just use http://moodle.com/helpdesk
Martin Dougiamas
Posts made by Martin Dougiamas
Moodle in English -> Lounge -> Is lounge not displaying? -> Re: Is lounge not displaying?
by Martin Dougiamas -
Mary seems to have accidentally posted lots of strange code from Word in her post about bulls and when shortened in the social course format it interacted badly with the theme.
Moodle in English -> General help -> Usability: Moodle - Usability Study (for an MSc): Anyone experience? -> Re: Usability: Moodle - Usability Study (for an MSc): Anyone experience?
by Martin Dougiamas -
Hey Syndia - excellent, well done!
I'm really looking forward to reading this. If you email a pdf to me I'll be happy to host it on moodle.org and list it under Buzz.
I'm really looking forward to reading this. If you email a pdf to me I'll be happy to host it on moodle.org and list it under Buzz.
Moodle in English -> General developer forum -> Licence Types of Blocks and Modules -> Re: Licence Types of Blocks and Modules
by Martin Dougiamas -
The fact that you sell software is completely unrelated to the license that the buyer is under.
In this case, if you sell GPL software, then the person who bought it is perfectly entitled to distribute the source code for free to anyone else they like. So I have no problem with anyone selling addons for Moodle or even Moodle itself (be it on your head when the buyer later discovers they could have downloaded it for free!)
My stance on licensing is that the cleanroom conditions required to legally NOT license new Moodle code under an open source license are so ridiculous that they are practically impossible, and so in the real world all new code should be under the GPL or a looser compatible license, as discussed by others here.
It's just a better model all round to think of selling your precious time rather than trying to impose the industrial-age concept of selling access to electrons that were basically free to produce.
In this case, if you sell GPL software, then the person who bought it is perfectly entitled to distribute the source code for free to anyone else they like. So I have no problem with anyone selling addons for Moodle or even Moodle itself (be it on your head when the buyer later discovers they could have downloaded it for free!)
My stance on licensing is that the cleanroom conditions required to legally NOT license new Moodle code under an open source license are so ridiculous that they are practically impossible, and so in the real world all new code should be under the GPL or a looser compatible license, as discussed by others here.
It's just a better model all round to think of selling your precious time rather than trying to impose the industrial-age concept of selling access to electrons that were basically free to produce.