interesting new article on web 2.0 vs LMS

interesting new article on web 2.0 vs LMS

by A. T. Wyatt -
Number of replies: 3
Apologies for those of you who cannot access the article directly; it isn't freely available.
Here is the citation information:

What Web 2.0 Can Teach Us About Learning, by EDWARD J. MALONEY

http://chronicle.com
Section: Information Technology
Volume 53, Issue 18, Page B26
accessed on June 21, 2007

First point that I appreciated very much:
Course-management systems were not created to enhance learning, but to make it easier for a faculty member to deliver materials to students. Even though most of the systems now include basic tools that allow students to turn in assignments, take exams and surveys, and communicate with each other through discussion boards and chat programs, those tools tend to be limited in functionality, generic in form, and based on relatively old technology.

Second point:

What we can see in the Web's evolution [speaking of web 2.0 applications, here] is a new focus on innovation, creation, and collaboration, and an emphasis on collective knowledge over static information delivery, knowledge management over content management, and social interaction over isolated surfing. The jargon-laden stars of the second-generation Web — wikis, blogs, social networking, and so on — all encourage a more active, participatory role for users.

Those new uses mirror much of what we know to be good models of learning, in that they are collaborative and encourage active participation by the user.

I think that this community has had quite a few discussions on the practice of using Moodle as an LMS and our desire to use its suite of collaborative features to transcend the limitations of "LMS as content deliverer". I think back to our discussions about the BB patent issue, the discussions revolving around "the LMS is dead", and similar topics. As far as I can tell, the proprietary systems are adding on collaborative tools (such as wiki and probably blogging), but at a price. I think it very interesting that the Moodle dropdown list for "add a resource" is far shorter than the dropdown list for "add an activity".

Dr. Maloney concludes this way:
People are using new technologies to look at problems in many different ways: to make new connections and form relationships between disparate, sometimes apparently contradictory, pieces of information, and ultimately to create something new that can be shared with others. All that is reminiscent of current approaches to learning, including student-centered and active-learning models that encourage students to solve meaningful problems and reflect on their thinking processes. The challenge that we now face is figuring out how to incorporate the paradigm-altering technologies of Web 2.0 into teaching and learning.

I think Moodle has made a good start.

atw

Average of ratings: -
In reply to A. T. Wyatt

Re: interesting new article on web 2.0 vs LMS

by Don Hinkelman -
Picture of Particularly helpful Moodlers Picture of Plugin developers
Hi A.T.,

Nice topic. I think we would all agree that Moodle brought Web 2.0 to the LMS world back in 2001 (or was it 2003?). And the massive new activity module expansion (expecially third-party) is expanding that further. Here is my list of how I think Moodle leads in collaborative, user participation.
  • flexible roles (1.7)
  • user generated question engine (1.9)
  • IMS-Learning Design Import-Export (2.0) - probably the only intl. standard for collaborative learning
  • flexible profile fields (1.8) - nicknames, birthdays, etc.
  • self-assessment, peer-assessment (workshop module, project module)
  • community hub (1.9)
  • repository API (1.9)
  • personal, transportable portfolio (2.1)
What can Moodle learn from other Web 2.0 applications? What do we need to add?
  • social networking course format
  • social networking repository for teachers (with fun incentives)
  • question engine integrated throughout modules
  • user-generated content publishing tools, interfaces
  • engaging games for learning, and socialising
  • role-playing worlds



In reply to Don Hinkelman

Re: interesting new article on web 2.0 vs LMS

by A. T. Wyatt -
Agreed! And some other things that would be nice are continued integration with external systems--ELGG, google's suite of collaborative tools (igoogle), flickr galleries, things like yackpack or voicethread. Some things, as you pointed out, are in the works!

atw
In reply to Don Hinkelman

Re: interesting new article on web 2.0 vs LMS

by Frances Bell -
A feature of many Web 2.0 applications and services is that they transcend boundaries home/work, private/public bringing benefits and problems. If (student) users generate content, what controil do they have over that? e.g. a student starts blogging in Moodle but wants to take their blog into the public (maybe ona different platform) . Should this be supported by standards?
Anyway we should be asking student users about this an other aspects. Maybe by taking a look at what they say, see this Facebook group with a familiar member.