Yes, I agree that any LTS version of Moodle should be more visible.
I am not arguing for or against upgrading to an LTS version of Moodle. It seems to be more of an issue about whether or not your organization prefers "minimum" changes over time or "regular" changes over time. For example, my wife's organization still uses Windows 10, even though Windows 11 has been out since October 2021, about two years ago! Perhaps her organization believes that "fewer changes are less disruptive."
So when it is mentioned that "4.1 (LTS) gets support 14 months longer than the 4.2," this doesn't mean that 4.1 will be the only version of Moodle that will have security support; it means that you will need to do more regular upgrades, meaning 4.2 to 4.3, etc. if you want a secure Moodle version.
Also, you have to decide if you want to (or can) "move with the flow" of Moodle's requirements or if you want to delay this movement. I use "delay" because, eventually, you will have to transition.
When one chooses Moodle 4.1, one also chooses a version that does not contain some of the most recent improvements to Moodle, which will likely be in the next LTS release. Are these improvements significant?
Again, I am not trying to argue one way or the other. It depends upon your organization's perspective and support folks. I don't want anyone to think they are "dead in the water" by choosing Moodle 4.2. Picking 4.2 means getting the latest version of Moodle (I would argue "the best"); however, you must do more regular upgrades for security reasons. Doing more regular updates also has the benefit of getting the latest improvements.
My personal choice has been to do regular updates, but this might be because I run a small Moodle. I do know that many universities prefer to do major upgrades only once each year.