Where are the other knowledgeable programmers? and why aren't they helping to set the record straight?
H5P was not designed for assessments (only). It should be (and is) usable for all kinds of contents and content for teaching and learning also goes way beyond the notion of assessments. But if high-stakes assessments are that crucial (I am not a teacher, I cannot judge), then choosing client-side evaluation was clearly a design flaw. I don't know the background however, so I can't tell what the prerequisites were.
Server-side evaluation is on the roadmap of H5P Group, but I don't thing this is going to hit the shelves soon, because it would mean quite some work to redesign the core of H5P and also existing content types.
So, the answer to "Where are the other knowledgeable programmers?" most likely is at "H5P Group". There are not too many H5P developers outside of the H5P core team, at least as far as I now of. I also don't believe that the moodle team is going to invest resources.
And my answer to "why aren't they helping to set the record straight" would be manifold: lack of documentation (for external contributors), lack of interest (the moodle team included H5P in core even though they knew it's using client-evaluation when they started, and they probably don't want to invest resources in "competition" that would make it easier to get server-side evaluation into other platforms, too), lack of funding (the number of developers who would work on this in their free is tiny), complexity of the project (many technical aspects, possibly even coordinate developers inside and outside of the H5P core team), ...