Canvas vs. Moodle

Re: Canvas vs. Moodle

by Rick Jerz -
Number of replies: 12
Picture of Particularly helpful Moodlers Picture of Testers

Colin, I will add another 2 cents (US) to what you have said.

My major (big 10) University used to have Blackboard and WebCt.  But Blackboard had all kinds of problems, and of course, doesn't move very fast to fix them.  When I was using Blackboard, my IT staff recommended switching to WebCT.  I did, and it was much better.  The same situation as what we have been talking about... my IT staff said "It appears that you are the kind of professor who wants more power and is willing to learn, so we recommend that you use WebCT."  Then Blackboard bought WebCT and killed it.  Since Blackboard was not responsive to the University needs, they decided to switch to D2L because D2L promised to be responsive to the University's needs.  After about 6 years or so of using D2L and finding that D2L was not responsive, along came Canvas saying "We will be responsive to your University's needs."  Now four years later, well... we are still waiting.

In my own experience, BB and D2L were not supportive, and I picked up Moodle thinking the same thing.  But to my surprise, some of my feature requests and bug reports actually got implemented.  Wow!  So I continue to make suggestions whenever possible.  But with Canvas, it's a dead end.

Okay, so here is where I end up.  Canvas seems to really want people to provide ideas and suggestions, and they want us to think that they have a system that gives users a priority and voice.  But what they have is the equivalent of McDonald's customer suggestion box.  Canvas decides what they do and do not want to do.  Moodle has a much better user-driven system.

One can read Canvas' system at this link.: https://community.canvaslms.com/docs/DOC-2109-how-does-the-voting-process-work-for-feature-ideas. Notice "A new idea may be pulled out of voting if the idea is incomplete or needs clarification from the contributor."  This means if they don't like it, it is pulled out. Also read "After six months ... Ideas in the bottom 90th percentile will be archived." So 90% of the suggestions are "canned."  This means "gone."  And it doesn't mean that 10% get implement, it just means that they can drop 90%.  They also say "Technically, ideas can be resubmitted (after they are canned.)"  But they forget to say "Good luck trying."

Average of ratings: Useful (1)
In reply to Rick Jerz

Re: Canvas vs. Moodle

by Colin Fraser -
Picture of Documentation writers Picture of Testers

I'm thinking that what Chris K is doing in Dearborn could be a model on effective use of resources and technology. That would work in any education or training environment, K-12 and College/University. To make it work though, it would need someone who is also a developer, or has the skill base to become a developer. 

In reply to Colin Fraser

Re: Canvas vs. Moodle

by Dave Perry -
Picture of Testers

Can you link to this Chris K post please?

In reply to Dave Perry

Re: Canvas vs. Moodle

by Colin Fraser -
Picture of Documentation writers Picture of Testers

Don't have to, Dave, it has been pinned as the first post in this Forum as recommended reading. There is a second post, on 3 ways on how to stop blended learning, but that is a bit further down..smile 

But it is...

Top Tech Tools....

In reply to Colin Fraser

Re: Canvas vs. Moodle

by Rick Jerz -
Picture of Particularly helpful Moodlers Picture of Testers

Interesting, Colin (and Dave).  Your post and how you created a link to "Top Tech Tools" demonstrates "linking to other posts." Might this be yet another feature of Moodle's discussions -- the ability to link to a very specific post by using a Permalink?  I just check my Canvas, and I cannot detect any similar feature (but maybe because Canvas is so simple, this feature is hidden. Someone else will have to verify this for me.  big grin )

I use this Permalink feature in Moodle all the time, a feature that is often missed by those not watching or learning moodle.  In fact, sometimes students will email me a question (yes, via a normal email) and I will point the student right to a very specific discussion post.  From the student's side, they click on my link in the email, if not logged into moodle they log in, then they are taken right to my post.

In reply to Rick Jerz

Re: Canvas vs. Moodle

by Colin Fraser -
Picture of Documentation writers Picture of Testers

That's how I have always logged in Rick, using the link in Thunderbird, my email app. I think I would be lost without it, because it takes me direct to the thread, if not the exact post I want to comment on, like this one.  

In reply to Rick Jerz

Re: Canvas vs. Moodle

by Peter Seaman -

Hi Rick: Our experiences with the LMS are really similar - except for the resolution.

I started at a large US community college in 2006, which was using WebCT. Then, as you pointed out, BB bought WebCT and moved us to their own BB version of WebCT (they called it "Blackboard CT") which was unstable. Everyone hated it and there was a clamor to adopt a new LMS in 2009.

My college looked at BB, Moodle (provided by one of the Moodle partners at the time), and D2L. D2L won out and my college has been using it since 2010.

The problem I have now is that I'm *really* tired of D2L. As you point out, it's really tough to get any features added, and the interface really hasn't evolved at all. But the guy who administers D2L at my college loves it and doesn't want to change. I met with him recently and he said something about putting his foot down with D2L "and this time they're going to listen!" I thought, Good luck with that.

Do you, or do any of our loyal readers, have any suggestions about what to do when an administrator is deeply entrenched in an LMS and doesn't want to change? The contract with the vendor is up for renewal in a few years, and I would just like to be able to shop around a little, but I fear I won't be able to - administrators will be unwilling to ask the question, Would we be better off with another LMS. Thanks.

In reply to Peter Seaman

Re: Canvas vs. Moodle

by Colin Fraser -
Picture of Documentation writers Picture of Testers

I don't know anything about D2L except that it sounded a lot like BlackBoard. So in a more generic sense, the questions I would be asking would be along the lines of: 

  • Is the LMS being used going to be within our future budgets?
  • What is their fee/charge model? How does that compare with other, similar tools?
  • Will changes we need for future development require an additional charge? 
  • What additional cost to customize existing tools if required?
  • What actual fees do we pay? 
  • Is there a support contract we are paying for?
  • Who owns the data? 
  • Does the LMS' supplier use our school data for their own purposes? e.g On-selling data? 
  • If we go to another LMS can we export courses easily? 
  • Do we have to budget for upgrading our infrastructure to meet the needs of this LMS?
  • Has customer support been sufficient to meet our need? 
  • Has the LMS supplier been responsive to a changing demand as we try to meet changing student need? 
  • Do we get regular updates offering new learning or improved tools? What kind of cost? 
  • Is there a clear upgrade and development path? 
  • Can we build learning plans and future targets around a roadmap for future development of the LMS?
  • Do our existing systems integrate with this LMS or can we work towards that integration?
  • Has the LMS been adaptable to changes in technology? e.g. cell phones
  • What is the current level of frustration of staff for the LMS? Satisfaction survey?
  • Can we develop inside this LMS so we can have a set of learning tools to meet our future needs?

Clearly this is not a comprehensive or complete list, but it might spur conversation. I suggest one area to explore is the future; costs, upgrades, development plans, responsiveness to changing external technologies, (e.g.cell phones are getting more an more sophisticated). Also, increasing pressure to adopt less traditional classroom practices is placing demands on any LMS, so how does D2L react to that? Moodle is incredibly flexible here, but is D2L? I don't know but these are some questions that could be asked, or be developed further or be a little less aggressive or more so if needed.  

The one advantage Moodle has over everything else is that it can not only be hosted by a Moodle Partner, but it can be self hosted with a high degree of competence by anyone who knows PHP, essentially, and even that is not an absolute requirement. As long as the Network admins are knowledgeable then there is really no reason anyone else needs to get involved at all.   

Good luck. 



Average of ratings: Useful (1)
In reply to Peter Seaman

Re: Canvas vs. Moodle

by Rick Jerz -
Picture of Particularly helpful Moodlers Picture of Testers

First, tell D2L that you are considering switching to Canvas.  D2L is losing its market to Canvas, so they need to get your message.

Then, if not successful, you might consider getting a faculty team to evaluate a switch to either Canvas or (and now include) Moodle.  This is procedural because most faculty don't know how to evaluate the difference, and it is too time involved.  So take your pick, then wine and dine these faculty (and administrators) to your preference.

If you are an administrator and end up with this stubborn supervisor, consider changing jobs.

If you are a teacher at this school, consider running Moodle on your own.

If you are looking for one major and important difference, you might want to collect a variety of syllabi and focus on grading.  Pick the LMS that can best satisfy all grading schemes.  If you are at a college with an engineering program, make sure to include syllabi (and grading schemes) for these engineering professors.

Average of ratings: Useful (3)
In reply to Peter Seaman

Forums - (was: Re: Canvas vs. Moodle)

by Sam Mudle -

The problem I have now is that I'm *really* tired of D2L. As you point out, it's really tough to get any features added, and the interface really hasn't evolved at all. But the guy who administers D2L at my college loves it and doesn't want to change. I met with him recently and he said something about putting his foot down with D2L "and this time they're going to listen!" I thought, Good luck with that.

I was a student this year in a Canvas-run course and also was paid to teach a D2L course as well.

In the 14 years I've been using Moodle I love it more and more.., but IMHO the single most glaring issue is Moodle's really primitive way of grading forum posts.  I use forums all of the time, and other than quiz and assignment, forum is the most used feature of the website.

In D2L, you can assign a forum as an assignment.  When you grade the forum posts,  you get a list of students. On each student, you automatically get a list all of their forum posts for that particular forum assignment.  You can then post feedback and give a grade.

In Moodle, it's a mess.  You have to assign a rating by clicking the user post. It's not super easy to just bring up all of the posts by one student because you have to hunt around for them.  There is no button called GRADE ALL POSTS.  For students who haven't posted, you have to then go into the grade book and type in zeros for those students.  It's a huge headache.


In reply to Sam Mudle

Re: Forums - (was: Re: Canvas vs. Moodle)

by Peter Seaman -

You make a good point about the ease of grading discussions in D2L and the seeming lack of ease of grading discussions in Moodle. I've asked some of the folks who designed Moodle forums why the forums were designed that way, but I've never gotten a really satisfying answer.

I suspect some of the apparent muddle of grading Moodle discussions stems from Moodle's social constructionist pedagogy, which posits that educators are supposed to care more about building knowledge through discussion (or "negotiation") than they are about transactional grading, which is something D2L really excels at.

I work with D2L and the other day an instructor said, "Hey! D2L has this polling feature my students and I can use to evaluate discussions!" I thought, Haven't we gone back to the future? But I had to admit I have never seen an instructor use this feature in D2L. Most instructors use discussions to assess student work and assign grades, and want the easiest and quickest way to do this, which is kinda sad, really.

Average of ratings: Useful (3)
In reply to Peter Seaman

Re: Forums - (was: Re: Canvas vs. Moodle)

by Sam Mudle -

I suspect some of the apparent muddle of grading Moodle discussions stems from Moodle's social constructionist pedagogy, which posits that educators are supposed to care more about building knowledge through discussion (or "negotiation") than they are about transactional grading, which is something D2L really excels at.

Yeah, I think the forum ratings system was really meant for students to rate each other.  It was not designed for teachers to apply a rubric to the post - which is what D2L allows.

In reply to Sam Mudle

Re: Forums - (was: Re: Canvas vs. Moodle)

by Colin Fraser -
Picture of Documentation writers Picture of Testers

Good point, but have you written this up in Moodle Tracker? I wouldn't suggest this is a trivial change, but I don't think it would require a huge rewrite.... maybe. 

@Peter,  "Most instructors use discussions ... and want the easiest and quickest way to do this, ... ." Yes, agreed, but I suspect that for Teachers it is all about time, the less time they have to spend on something gives them more time to spend elsewhere.  

Average of ratings: Useful (1)