Moodle in English: UnixBench

UnixBench

by Visvanath Ratnaweera - Thursday, 12 April 2012, 5:53 AM

UnixBench could be a suitable tool to measure and compare (Moodle) server performance, albeit Unix. But that covers a whole lot: Linux, *BSD, Mac OS X, Solaris, etc. (Grant, thanks for bringing up the subject, n http://moodle.org/mod/forum/discuss.php?d=200247. )

I will post the UnixBench results on a couple of machines as time permits. I already ran it on my laptop and saw the CPU temp. cranking up to 97 C for the first time! According to ACPI the cut-off temp. is 100 C, steady 50 C during normal work. The benchmark took a long time, I was using the laptop during the whole time.

It would be interesting to get figures from other servers too.

Here are some further reading on UnixBench:
- Project Home http://code.google.com/p/byte-unixbench/
- Download http://code.google.com/p/byte-unixbench/downloads/list
- A 'historical' note from year 2000 http://www.unix.com/linux-benchmarks/11173-original-byte-unix-benchmarks-version-3-11-a.html

Average of ratings: -

Benchmark of Lenovo X201, Debian 'Squeeze' (CrunchBang Linux)

by Visvanath Ratnaweera - Thursday, 12 April 2012, 5:57 AM

Benchmark of x201 / GNU/Linux on Wed Apr 11 2012

BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)

Test System Information

System:	x201: GNU/Linux
OS:	GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-5-686 -- #1 SMP Mon Mar 26 05:20:33 UTC 2012
Machine:	i686: unknown
Language:	en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
CPUs:	0:	Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU M 540 @ 2.53GHz (5053.8 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, Intel virtualization
	1:	Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU M 540 @ 2.53GHz (5053.9 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, Intel virtualization
	2:	Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU M 540 @ 2.53GHz (5053.9 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, Intel virtualization
	3:	Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU M 540 @ 2.53GHz (5053.9 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, Intel virtualization
Uptime:	17:06:11 up 5 min, 2 users, load average: 0.13, 0.31, 0.17; runlevel 2

Benchmark Run: 4 CPUs; 1 parallel process

Time: 17:06:11 - 17:35:07; 28m 56s

System Benchmarks

Test	Score	Unit	Time	Iters.	Baseline	Index
Dhrystone 2 using register variables	`16939413.3`	`lps`	`10.0 s`	`7`	`116700.0`	`1451.5`
Double-Precision Whetstone	`3072.7`	`MWIPS`	`10.0 s`	`7`	`55.0`	`558.7`
Execl Throughput	`2184.3`	`lps`	`29.5 s`	`2`	`43.0`	`508.0`
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks	`689043.5`	`KBps`	`30.0 s`	`2`	`3960.0`	`1740.0`
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks	`232570.6`	`KBps`	`30.0 s`	`2`	`1655.0`	`1405.3`
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks	`1534656.4`	`KBps`	`30.0 s`	`2`	`5800.0`	`2646.0`
Pipe Throughput	`1572782.1`	`lps`	`10.0 s`	`7`	`12440.0`	`1264.3`
Pipe-based Context Switching	`77688.4`	`lps`	`10.0 s`	`7`	`4000.0`	`194.2`
Process Creation	`9660.4`	`lps`	`30.0 s`	`2`	`126.0`	`766.7`
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)	`3531.6`	`lpm`	`60.0 s`	`2`	`42.4`	`832.9`
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)	`1530.4`	`lpm`	`60.0 s`	`2`	`6.0`	`2550.7`
System Call Overhead	`3342588.9`	`lps`	`10.0 s`	`7`	`15000.0`	`2228.4`
System Benchmarks Index Score:						`1074.8`

Benchmark Run: 4 CPUs; 4 parallel processes

Time: 17:35:07 - 18:03:59; 28m 52s

System Benchmarks

Test	Score	Unit	Time	Iters.	Baseline	Index
Dhrystone 2 using register variables	`30018911.8`	`lps`	`10.0 s`	`7`	`116700.0`	`2572.3`
Double-Precision Whetstone	`9163.7`	`MWIPS`	`10.3 s`	`7`	`55.0`	`1666.1`
Execl Throughput	`13377.9`	`lps`	`29.6 s`	`2`	`43.0`	`3111.1`
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks	`659220.3`	`KBps`	`30.0 s`	`2`	`3960.0`	`1664.7`
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks	`166040.9`	`KBps`	`30.0 s`	`2`	`1655.0`	`1003.3`
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks	`1780714.4`	`KBps`	`30.0 s`	`2`	`5800.0`	`3070.2`
Pipe Throughput	`3407168.6`	`lps`	`10.0 s`	`7`	`12440.0`	`2738.9`
Pipe-based Context Switching	`853534.7`	`lps`	`10.0 s`	`7`	`4000.0`	`2133.8`
Process Creation	`45889.4`	`lps`	`30.0 s`	`2`	`126.0`	`3642.0`
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)	`15110.5`	`lpm`	`60.0 s`	`2`	`42.4`	`3563.8`
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)	`1956.6`	`lpm`	`60.1 s`	`2`	`6.0`	`3261.0`
System Call Overhead	`7607059.0`	`lps`	`10.0 s`	`7`	`15000.0`	`5071.4`
System Benchmarks Index Score:						`2577.0`

Average of ratings: -

Re: UnixBench

by Andrew Lyons - Thursday, 12 April 2012, 5:06 PM

This is the UnixBench from my development desktop:

Hardware:
Dell OptiPlex 980
8GB RAM
Core-i7-870
2 x 500GB, 7,200 SATA disks in software RAID-1

Software:
amd64 Debian Squeeze Linux

 

========================================================================

   BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)



   System: kumquat: GNU/Linux

   OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-5-vserver-amd64 -- #1 SMP Mon Jan 16 19:31:31 UTC 2012

   Machine: x86_64 (unknown)

   Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="ANSI_X3.4-1968", collate="ANSI_X3.4-1968")

   CPU 0: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 870 @ 2.93GHz (5853.0 bogomips)

          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization

   CPU 1: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 870 @ 2.93GHz (5851.7 bogomips)

          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization

   CPU 2: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 870 @ 2.93GHz (5851.7 bogomips)

          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization

   CPU 3: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 870 @ 2.93GHz (5851.7 bogomips)

          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization

   CPU 4: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 870 @ 2.93GHz (5851.7 bogomips)

          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization

   CPU 5: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 870 @ 2.93GHz (5851.7 bogomips)

          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization

   CPU 6: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 870 @ 2.93GHz (5851.7 bogomips)

          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization

   CPU 7: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 870 @ 2.93GHz (5851.7 bogomips)

          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization

   08:55:53 up 26 days, 16:25, 19 users,  load average: 0.63, 0.50, 0.45; runlevel 



------------------------------------------------------------------------

Benchmark Run: Thu Apr 12 2012 08:55:53 - 09:24:51

8 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests



Dhrystone 2 using register variables       34186075.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

Double-Precision Whetstone                     4193.0 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)

Execl Throughput                               3720.9 lps   (29.7 s, 2 samples)

File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks       1179011.5 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)

File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          333164.4 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)

File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       2082148.1 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)

Pipe Throughput                             2705173.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

Pipe-based Context Switching                 172776.6 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

Process Creation                              18009.2 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)

Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                  10030.1 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)

Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   4329.4 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)

System Call Overhead                        4444110.5 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)



System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX

Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   34186075.8   2929.4

Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       4193.0    762.4

Execl Throughput                                 43.0       3720.9    865.3

File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0    1179011.5   2977.3

File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     333164.4   2013.1

File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    2082148.1   3589.9

Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    2705173.8   2174.6

Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     172776.6    431.9

Process Creation                                126.0      18009.2   1429.3

Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4      10030.1   2365.6

Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       4329.4   7215.7

System Call Overhead                          15000.0    4444110.5   2962.7

                                                                   ========

System Benchmarks Index Score                                        1938.9



------------------------------------------------------------------------

Benchmark Run: Thu Apr 12 2012 09:24:51 - 09:55:32

8 CPUs in system; running 8 parallel copies of tests



Dhrystone 2 using register variables      124402799.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

Double-Precision Whetstone                    25046.0 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)

Execl Throughput                              26597.9 lps   (29.6 s, 2 samples)

File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        908822.8 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)

File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          241018.8 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)

File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       3155481.5 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)

Pipe Throughput                            11104941.9 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

Pipe-based Context Switching                2220113.1 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

Process Creation                              72785.5 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)

Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                  39869.8 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)

Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   5221.3 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)

System Call Overhead                       15175223.3 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)



System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX

Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0  124402799.2  10660.1

Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0      25046.0   4553.8

Execl Throughput                                 43.0      26597.9   6185.6

File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     908822.8   2295.0

File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     241018.8   1456.3

File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    3155481.5   5440.5

Pipe Throughput                               12440.0   11104941.9   8926.8

Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0    2220113.1   5550.3

Process Creation                                126.0      72785.5   5776.6

Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4      39869.8   9403.3

Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       5221.3   8702.2

System Call Overhead                          15000.0   15175223.3  10116.8

                                                                   ========

System Benchmarks Index Score                                        5745.4

Average of ratings: Useful (1)

Benchmark of an AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 6000+

by Visvanath Ratnaweera - Thursday, 12 April 2012, 10:09 PM

These are the results from an "economy" dedicated server during mid 2009.

Benchmark of sparta / GNU/Linux on Don Apr 12 2012

BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)

Test System Information

System:	sparta: GNU/Linux
OS:	GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-5-amd64 -- #1 SMP Thu Mar 22 17:26:33 UTC 2012
Machine:	x86_64: unknown
Language:	en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
CPUs:	0:	AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 6000+ (5999.8 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, AMD MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, AMD virtualization, SYSCALL/SYSRET
	1:	AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 6000+ (5999.8 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, AMD MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, AMD virtualization, SYSCALL/SYSRET
Uptime:	10:05:57 up 2 days, 8:07, 2 users, load average: 0.08, 0.07, 0.07; runlevel

Benchmark Run: 2 CPUs; 1 parallel process

Time: 10:05:57 - 10:34:32; 28m 35s

System Benchmarks

Test	Score	Unit	Time	Iters.	Baseline	Index
Dhrystone 2 using register variables	`19723653.6`	`lps`	`10.0 s`	`7`	`116700.0`	`1690.1`
Double-Precision Whetstone	`2883.3`	`MWIPS`	`9.9 s`	`7`	`55.0`	`524.2`
Execl Throughput	`1145.3`	`lps`	`29.6 s`	`2`	`43.0`	`266.4`
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks	`344873.4`	`KBps`	`30.0 s`	`2`	`3960.0`	`870.9`
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks	`109004.9`	`KBps`	`30.0 s`	`2`	`1655.0`	`658.6`
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks	`686858.1`	`KBps`	`30.0 s`	`2`	`5800.0`	`1184.2`
Pipe Throughput	`1330479.6`	`lps`	`10.0 s`	`7`	`12440.0`	`1069.5`
Pipe-based Context Switching	`101360.7`	`lps`	`10.0 s`	`7`	`4000.0`	`253.4`
Process Creation	`5889.4`	`lps`	`30.0 s`	`2`	`126.0`	`467.4`
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)	`3829.4`	`lpm`	`60.0 s`	`2`	`42.4`	`903.1`
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)	`1222.7`	`lpm`	`60.0 s`	`2`	`6.0`	`2037.8`
System Call Overhead	`2449767.0`	`lps`	`10.0 s`	`7`	`15000.0`	`1633.2`
System Benchmarks Index Score:						`792.1`

Benchmark Run: 2 CPUs; 2 parallel processes

Time: 10:34:32 - 11:03:17; 28m 45s

System Benchmarks

Test	Score	Unit	Time	Iters.	Baseline	Index
Dhrystone 2 using register variables	`38921030.2`	`lps`	`10.0 s`	`7`	`116700.0`	`3335.1`
Double-Precision Whetstone	`5772.3`	`MWIPS`	`9.9 s`	`7`	`55.0`	`1049.5`
Execl Throughput	`6585.9`	`lps`	`29.7 s`	`2`	`43.0`	`1531.6`
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks	`371359.5`	`KBps`	`30.0 s`	`2`	`3960.0`	`937.8`
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks	`114869.2`	`KBps`	`30.0 s`	`2`	`1655.0`	`694.1`
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks	`866752.6`	`KBps`	`30.0 s`	`2`	`5800.0`	`1494.4`
Pipe Throughput	`2493383.9`	`lps`	`10.0 s`	`7`	`12440.0`	`2004.3`
Pipe-based Context Switching	`509389.9`	`lps`	`10.0 s`	`7`	`4000.0`	`1273.5`
Process Creation	`18662.1`	`lps`	`30.0 s`	`2`	`126.0`	`1481.1`
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)	`9279.3`	`lpm`	`60.0 s`	`2`	`42.4`	`2188.5`
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)	`1222.5`	`lpm`	`60.1 s`	`2`	`6.0`	`2037.4`
System Call Overhead	`3398125.4`	`lps`	`10.0 s`	`7`	`15000.0`	`2265.4`
System Benchmarks Index Score:						`1554.5`

Average of ratings: -

Benchmark of an Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz

by Visvanath Ratnaweera - Thursday, 12 April 2012, 10:38 PM

From a "state of the art" server, mid 2008:

Benchmark of hektor / GNU/Linux on Thu Apr 12 2012

BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)

Test System Information

System:	hektor: GNU/Linux
OS:	GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-5-amd64 -- #1 SMP Mon Jan 16 16:22:28 UTC 2012
Machine:	x86_64: unknown
Language:	en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
CPUs:	0:	Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz (5345.7 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
	1:	Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz (5346.3 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
	2:	Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz (5346.3 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
	3:	Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz (5346.3 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
	4:	Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz (5346.3 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
	5:	Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz (5346.3 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
	6:	Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz (5346.3 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
	7:	Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz (5346.3 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
Uptime:	10:13:54 up 73 days, 11:40, 1 user, load average: 0.21, 0.13, 0.03; runlevel

Benchmark Run: 8 CPUs; 1 parallel process

Time: 10:13:54 - 10:42:22; 28m 28s

System Benchmarks

Test	Score	Unit	Time	Iters.	Baseline	Index
Dhrystone 2 using register variables	`27182717.6`	`lps`	`10.0 s`	`7`	`116700.0`	`2329.3`
Double-Precision Whetstone	`3513.8`	`MWIPS`	`10.0 s`	`7`	`55.0`	`638.9`
Execl Throughput	`2428.5`	`lps`	`29.7 s`	`2`	`43.0`	`564.8`
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks	`1011243.0`	`KBps`	`30.0 s`	`2`	`3960.0`	`2553.6`
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks	`279901.8`	`KBps`	`30.0 s`	`2`	`1655.0`	`1691.2`
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks	`1979867.4`	`KBps`	`30.0 s`	`2`	`5800.0`	`3413.6`
Pipe Throughput	`2397637.3`	`lps`	`10.0 s`	`7`	`12440.0`	`1927.4`
Pipe-based Context Switching	`115259.7`	`lps`	`10.0 s`	`7`	`4000.0`	`288.1`
Process Creation	`10192.7`	`lps`	`30.0 s`	`2`	`126.0`	`808.9`
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)	`5181.5`	`lpm`	`60.0 s`	`2`	`42.4`	`1222.0`
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)	`3888.3`	`lpm`	`60.0 s`	`2`	`6.0`	`6480.5`
System Call Overhead	`4054233.2`	`lps`	`10.0 s`	`7`	`15000.0`	`2702.8`
System Benchmarks Index Score:						`1489.4`

Benchmark Run: 8 CPUs; 8 parallel processes

Time: 10:42:22 - 11:11:03; 28m 41s

System Benchmarks

Test	Score	Unit	Time	Iters.	Baseline	Index
Dhrystone 2 using register variables	`117405059.5`	`lps`	`10.0 s`	`7`	`116700.0`	`10060.4`
Double-Precision Whetstone	`22534.4`	`MWIPS`	`10.0 s`	`7`	`55.0`	`4097.2`
Execl Throughput	`26402.9`	`lps`	`29.8 s`	`2`	`43.0`	`6140.2`
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks	`791049.3`	`KBps`	`30.0 s`	`2`	`3960.0`	`1997.6`
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks	`206441.1`	`KBps`	`30.0 s`	`2`	`1655.0`	`1247.4`
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks	`1910128.3`	`KBps`	`30.0 s`	`2`	`5800.0`	`3293.3`
Pipe Throughput	`10625825.5`	`lps`	`10.0 s`	`7`	`12440.0`	`8541.7`
Pipe-based Context Switching	`2193809.4`	`lps`	`10.0 s`	`7`	`4000.0`	`5484.5`
Process Creation	`78275.4`	`lps`	`30.0 s`	`2`	`126.0`	`6212.3`
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)	`37846.5`	`lpm`	`60.0 s`	`2`	`42.4`	`8926.1`
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)	`4917.4`	`lpm`	`60.0 s`	`2`	`6.0`	`8195.6`
System Call Overhead	`14035581.7`	`lps`	`10.0 s`	`7`	`15000.0`	`9357.1`
System Benchmarks Index Score:						`5224.7`

Average of ratings: -

Re: UnixBench

by Grant Mucha - Thursday, 12 April 2012, 10:45 PM

Hi Visvanath!

Awesome thanks, do you mind including this information here?

Preferrably for actual webservers.

http://nginx.ddns.net/charts/

http://nginx.ddns.net/charts/submit-benchmark/

I just built the DB and Form yesterday so if you have any suggestions please let me know.

Average of ratings: -

Re: UnixBench

by Grant Mucha - Thursday, 12 April 2012, 10:47 PM

It seems like an a decent benchmark overall.

If you look at the processors and compare the results it seems to make sense. Do any of your rated systems have SSD or RAID configurations?

Average of ratings: -

Re: UnixBench

by Visvanath Ratnaweera - Friday, 13 April 2012, 5:35 AM

Hi Grant

The benchmark is sufficiently high level that it takes the operating system and the file system into account. Still not "too high" that the remaining software stack comes into play introducing too many variables. There is a price for its simplicity: one can't even think of converting the result into a max. no. of concurrent users, because the amount of RAM is not part of the formula.

The other question about a machine database: I'm not keen on reentering the data into a mask. In fact, I haven't done any formatting for these posts. UnixBench creates a HTML file which I've copied one-to-one into the text box (changing the format into 'HTML format?).

About actual servers: The two servers above are still in production use. The dates I've given are the dates they were commissioned.

Average of ratings: -

Benchmark of HP Mini netbook

by Visvanath Ratnaweera - Friday, 13 April 2012, 5:22 AM

Netbook HP Mini, mid 2011

Benchmark of mini / GNU/Linux on Thu Apr 12 2012

BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)

Test System Information

System:	mini: GNU/Linux
OS:	GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-5-686 -- #1 SMP Mon Mar 26 05:20:33 UTC 2012
Machine:	i686: unknown
Language:	en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
CPUs:	0:	Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU N570 @ 1.66GHz (3324.4 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, Intel virtualization
	1:	Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU N570 @ 1.66GHz (3324.9 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, Intel virtualization
	2:	Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU N570 @ 1.66GHz (3325.0 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, Intel virtualization
	3:	Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU N570 @ 1.66GHz (3325.0 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, Intel virtualization
Uptime:	23:10:20 up 8 min, 3 users, load average: 0.39, 0.24, 0.12; runlevel 2

Benchmark Run: 4 CPUs; 1 parallel process

Time: 23:10:20 - 23:39:09; 28m 49s

System Benchmarks

Test	Score	Unit	Time	Iters.	Baseline	Index
Dhrystone 2 using register variables	`4109374.3`	`lps`	`10.0 s`	`7`	`116700.0`	`352.1`
Double-Precision Whetstone	`590.8`	`MWIPS`	`10.1 s`	`7`	`55.0`	`107.4`
Execl Throughput	`840.1`	`lps`	`29.7 s`	`2`	`43.0`	`195.4`
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks	`149028.4`	`KBps`	`30.0 s`	`2`	`3960.0`	`376.3`
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks	`43401.0`	`KBps`	`30.0 s`	`2`	`1655.0`	`262.2`
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks	`400512.8`	`KBps`	`30.0 s`	`2`	`5800.0`	`690.5`
Pipe Throughput	`385136.9`	`lps`	`10.0 s`	`7`	`12440.0`	`309.6`
Pipe-based Context Switching	`18467.5`	`lps`	`10.0 s`	`7`	`4000.0`	`46.2`
Process Creation	`2836.8`	`lps`	`30.0 s`	`2`	`126.0`	`225.1`
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)	`1375.4`	`lpm`	`60.0 s`	`2`	`42.4`	`324.4`
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)	`508.3`	`lpm`	`60.1 s`	`2`	`6.0`	`847.2`
System Call Overhead	`726966.4`	`lps`	`10.0 s`	`7`	`15000.0`	`484.6`
System Benchmarks Index Score:						`278.3`

Benchmark Run: 4 CPUs; 4 parallel processes

Time: 23:39:09 - 00:07:51; 28m 42s

System Benchmarks

Test	Score	Unit	Time	Iters.	Baseline	Index
Dhrystone 2 using register variables	`11156287.8`	`lps`	`10.0 s`	`7`	`116700.0`	`956.0`
Double-Precision Whetstone	`2026.0`	`MWIPS`	`10.0 s`	`7`	`55.0`	`368.4`
Execl Throughput	`3708.5`	`lps`	`29.6 s`	`2`	`43.0`	`862.4`
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks	`143287.1`	`KBps`	`30.0 s`	`2`	`3960.0`	`361.8`
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks	`39793.6`	`KBps`	`30.0 s`	`2`	`1655.0`	`240.4`
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks	`397561.1`	`KBps`	`30.0 s`	`2`	`5800.0`	`685.5`
Pipe Throughput	`752206.2`	`lps`	`10.0 s`	`7`	`12440.0`	`604.7`
Pipe-based Context Switching	`220154.4`	`lps`	`10.0 s`	`7`	`4000.0`	`550.4`
Process Creation	`12138.0`	`lps`	`30.0 s`	`2`	`126.0`	`963.3`
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)	`4141.3`	`lpm`	`60.0 s`	`2`	`42.4`	`976.7`
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)	`540.4`	`lpm`	`60.2 s`	`2`	`6.0`	`900.6`
System Call Overhead	`1635253.8`	`lps`	`10.0 s`	`7`	`15000.0`	`1090.2`
System Benchmarks Index Score:						`648.8`

Average of ratings: -

Benchmark of ZOTAC ZBOX ID41 PLUS mini-PC, Jan 2012

by Visvanath Ratnaweera - Friday, 13 April 2012, 5:43 AM

ZOTAC ZBOX HD-ID41 PLUS

Benchmark of zotac / GNU/Linux on Thu Apr 12 2012

BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)

Test System Information

System:	zotac: GNU/Linux
OS:	GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-5-686 -- #1 SMP Mon Mar 26 05:20:33 UTC 2012
Machine:	i686: unknown
Language:	en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
CPUs:	0:	Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU D525 @ 1.80GHz (3591.6 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT
	1:	Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU D525 @ 1.80GHz (3591.4 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT
	2:	Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU D525 @ 1.80GHz (3591.6 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT
	3:	Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU D525 @ 1.80GHz (3591.4 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT
Uptime:	22:33:16 up 5 min, 3 users, load average: 0.09, 0.16, 0.09; runlevel

Benchmark Run: 4 CPUs; 1 parallel process

Time: 22:33:16 - 23:01:54; 28m 38s

System Benchmarks

Test	Score	Unit	Time	Iters.	Baseline	Index
Dhrystone 2 using register variables	`4484549.7`	`lps`	`10.0 s`	`7`	`116700.0`	`384.3`
Double-Precision Whetstone	`572.4`	`MWIPS`	`10.1 s`	`7`	`55.0`	`104.1`
Execl Throughput	`1417.4`	`lps`	`29.8 s`	`2`	`43.0`	`329.6`
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks	`162318.2`	`KBps`	`30.0 s`	`2`	`3960.0`	`409.9`
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks	`45584.5`	`KBps`	`30.0 s`	`2`	`1655.0`	`275.4`
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks	`453137.8`	`KBps`	`30.0 s`	`2`	`5800.0`	`781.3`
Pipe Throughput	`369167.6`	`lps`	`10.0 s`	`7`	`12440.0`	`296.8`
Pipe-based Context Switching	`48363.7`	`lps`	`10.0 s`	`7`	`4000.0`	`120.9`
Process Creation	`4913.8`	`lps`	`30.0 s`	`2`	`126.0`	`390.0`
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)	`2018.7`	`lpm`	`60.0 s`	`2`	`42.4`	`476.1`
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)	`557.2`	`lpm`	`60.1 s`	`2`	`6.0`	`928.7`
System Call Overhead	`788825.9`	`lps`	`10.0 s`	`7`	`15000.0`	`525.9`
System Benchmarks Index Score:						`353.3`

Benchmark Run: 4 CPUs; 4 parallel processes

Time: 23:01:54 - 23:30:45; 28m 51s

System Benchmarks

Test	Score	Unit	Time	Iters.	Baseline	Index
Dhrystone 2 using register variables	`12136234.2`	`lps`	`10.0 s`	`7`	`116700.0`	`1040.0`
Double-Precision Whetstone	`2202.6`	`MWIPS`	`10.1 s`	`7`	`55.0`	`400.5`
Execl Throughput	`3758.8`	`lps`	`29.5 s`	`2`	`43.0`	`874.1`
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks	`176208.4`	`KBps`	`30.0 s`	`2`	`3960.0`	`445.0`
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks	`49310.5`	`KBps`	`30.0 s`	`2`	`1655.0`	`297.9`
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks	`456015.8`	`KBps`	`30.0 s`	`2`	`5800.0`	`786.2`
Pipe Throughput	`755402.8`	`lps`	`10.0 s`	`7`	`12440.0`	`607.2`
Pipe-based Context Switching	`224864.5`	`lps`	`10.0 s`	`7`	`4000.0`	`562.2`
Process Creation	`12673.7`	`lps`	`30.0 s`	`2`	`126.0`	`1005.8`
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)	`4446.1`	`lpm`	`60.0 s`	`2`	`42.4`	`1048.6`
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)	`580.0`	`lpm`	`60.2 s`	`2`	`6.0`	`966.6`
System Call Overhead	`1777936.6`	`lps`	`10.0 s`	`7`	`15000.0`	`1185.3`
System Benchmarks Index Score:						`707.2`

Average of ratings: -

Re: Benchmark of ZOTAC ZBOX ID41 PLUS mini-PC, Jan 2012

by Grant Mucha - Friday, 13 April 2012, 1:39 PM

I still think it is a valid benchmark for guestimating overall performance. Taking into consideration everyone, even non-moodlers can use this as a base perspective.

Who wants to pay a ton of money for a system with weak system bench (cpu, file system, os, kernel) yes no ram, but still.

With all the VPS systems on the market I have a feeling it will be easy to spot differences between two systems. For instance two VPS with 512mb ram yet very different final system benchmarks.

Thanks for the posts. Your Atom D525 scored slighly lower then mine!

Average of ratings: -

Benchmark of dimut, a medium sized VPS

by Visvanath Ratnaweera - Saturday, 14 April 2012, 5:01 AM

Benchmark of dimut / GNU/Linux on Fri Apr 13 2012

BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)

Test System Information

System:	dimut: GNU/Linux
OS:	GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-5-686-bigmem -- #1 SMP Mon Mar 26 06:12:49 UTC 2012
Machine:	i686: unknown
Language:	en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
CPUs:	0:	QEMU Virtual CPU version 0.12.3 (5347.7 bogomips) x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET
Uptime:	21:34:51 up 20 min, 1 user, load average: 0.11, 0.03, 0.01; runlevel

Benchmark Run: 1 CPU; 1 parallel process

Time: 21:34:51 - 22:03:00; 28m 09s

System Benchmarks

Test	Score	Unit	Time	Iters.	Baseline	Index
Dhrystone 2 using register variables	`14518664.0`	`lps`	`10.0 s`	`7`	`116700.0`	`1244.1`
Double-Precision Whetstone	`2851.8`	`MWIPS`	`9.9 s`	`7`	`55.0`	`518.5`
Execl Throughput	`4341.0`	`lps`	`30.0 s`	`2`	`43.0`	`1009.5`
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks	`628763.8`	`KBps`	`30.0 s`	`2`	`3960.0`	`1587.8`
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks	`171301.3`	`KBps`	`30.0 s`	`2`	`1655.0`	`1035.1`
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks	`1619145.0`	`KBps`	`30.0 s`	`2`	`5800.0`	`2791.6`
Pipe Throughput	`1279760.2`	`lps`	`10.0 s`	`7`	`12440.0`	`1028.7`
Pipe-based Context Switching	`267606.1`	`lps`	`10.0 s`	`7`	`4000.0`	`669.0`
Process Creation	`13194.0`	`lps`	`30.0 s`	`2`	`126.0`	`1047.1`
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)	`5530.5`	`lpm`	`60.0 s`	`2`	`42.4`	`1304.4`
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)	`679.9`	`lpm`	`60.0 s`	`2`	`6.0`	`1133.2`
System Call Overhead	`1156924.3`	`lps`	`10.0 s`	`7`	`15000.0`	`771.3`
System Benchmarks Index Score:						`1077.7`

Average of ratings: -

Re: Benchmark of dimut, a medium sized VPS

by Grant Mucha - Saturday, 14 April 2012, 6:06 AM

Anychance you can include which company the servers are located and the price per month / year. Otherwise the results are just benchmarks.

Average of ratings: -

Re: Benchmark of dimut, a medium sized VPS

by Visvanath Ratnaweera - Saturday, 14 April 2012, 7:17 PM

Hi Grant

The figures are meant to be as 'typical' results for certain kinds of servers at certain times. I don't think this forum can cope with exact comparisons of the countless hosting solutions in the Net. There are not only too many, they are changing on a weekly basis!

Average of ratings: -

Re: Benchmark of dimut, a medium sized VPS

by Grant Mucha - Saturday, 14 April 2012, 11:56 PM

Hi Visvanath,

The main reason I introduced my UnixBench results where to show that AWS EC2 overall performance is weak vs their cost.

Example:

AWS EC2 small instance $65/month minimum with 200 - 220 system benchmark.

Also, I'm not asking for anyone, including yourself to post information about every single hosting provider. Simply posting one of your better VPS or Dedicated systems with provider / cost / and configuration.

Typically administrators don't jump around between hosting / datacenters. At least I know I don't. So your countless hosting solutions turn out to be only handful which is easily doable. More importantly very helpful people trying to make a decision where to host Moodle.

Posting benchmarks without (Hosting Provider, Cost, configurations like raid setup) become useless. Unless your just having fun! Everyone knows that and i7 CPU 920 based system is going to provide a higher system benchmark then an i5 or i3 based system.

Average of ratings: -

Benchmark of another medium sized VPS

by Visvanath Ratnaweera - Tuesday, 16 October 2012, 4:44 AM

System:	xxxxx.xxxxx.xxx: GNU/Linux
OS:	GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-042stab039.10 -- #1 SMP Tue Nov 1 13:31:08 MSK 2011
Machine:	x86_64: x86_64
Language:	en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
CPUs:	0:	Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5645 @ 2.40GHz (4799.8 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
	1:	Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5645 @ 2.40GHz (4799.8 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
	2:	Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5645 @ 2.40GHz (4799.8 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
	3:	Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5645 @ 2.40GHz (4799.8 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
	4:	Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5645 @ 2.40GHz (4799.8 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
	5:	Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5645 @ 2.40GHz (4760.3 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
	6:	Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5645 @ 2.40GHz (4799.9 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
	7:	Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5645 @ 2.40GHz (4799.9 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
	8:	Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5645 @ 2.40GHz (4799.9 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
	9:	Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5645 @ 2.40GHz (4799.9 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
	10:	Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5645 @ 2.40GHz (4799.9 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
	11:	Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5645 @ 2.40GHz (4799.9 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
	12:	Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5645 @ 2.40GHz (4799.9 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
	13:	Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5645 @ 2.40GHz (4799.9 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
	14:	Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5645 @ 2.40GHz (4799.9 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
	15:	Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5645 @ 2.40GHz (4799.9 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
	16:	Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5645 @ 2.40GHz (4847.2 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
	17:	Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5645 @ 2.40GHz (4799.9 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
	18:	Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5645 @ 2.40GHz (4799.9 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
	19:	Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5645 @ 2.40GHz (4799.9 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
	20:	Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5645 @ 2.40GHz (4799.9 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
	21:	Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5645 @ 2.40GHz (4799.9 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
	22:	Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5645 @ 2.40GHz (4749.5 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
	23:	Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5645 @ 2.40GHz (4799.9 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
Uptime:	17:35:14 up 18:57, 2 users, load average: 0.00, 0.14, 0.61; runlevel 3

Benchmark Run: 24 CPUs; 1 parallel process

Time: 17:35:14 - 18:04:31; 29m 17s

System Benchmarks

Test	Score	Unit	Time	Iters.	Baseline	Index
Dhrystone 2 using register variables	`23066093.6`	`lps`	`10.0 s`	`7`	`116700.0`	`1976.5`
Double-Precision Whetstone	`2889.8`	`MWIPS`	`9.9 s`	`7`	`55.0`	`525.4`
Execl Throughput	`2513.7`	`lps`	`29.9 s`	`2`	`43.0`	`584.6`
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks	`710042.4`	`KBps`	`30.0 s`	`2`	`3960.0`	`1793.0`
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks	`202687.0`	`KBps`	`30.0 s`	`2`	`1655.0`	`1224.7`
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks	`1481542.2`	`KBps`	`30.0 s`	`2`	`5800.0`	`2554.4`
Pipe Throughput	`1836180.3`	`lps`	`10.0 s`	`7`	`12440.0`	`1476.0`
Pipe-based Context Switching	`121310.3`	`lps`	`10.0 s`	`7`	`4000.0`	`303.3`
Process Creation	`6720.9`	`lps`	`30.0 s`	`2`	`126.0`	`533.4`
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)	`4715.9`	`lpm`	`60.0 s`	`2`	`42.4`	`1112.2`
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)	`2781.6`	`lpm`	`60.0 s`	`2`	`6.0`	`4636.1`
System Call Overhead	`3180375.3`	`lps`	`10.0 s`	`7`	`15000.0`	`2120.3`
System Benchmarks Index Score:						`1199.7`

Benchmark Run: 24 CPUs; 24 parallel processes

Time: 18:04:31 - 18:04:31; 0m 00s

Average of ratings: -

Intel® Core™ i7-4770 Quadcore with SSD in RAID-1

by Visvanath Ratnaweera - Wednesday, 25 September 2013, 6:07 PM

Benchmark of Debian-70-wheezy-64 / GNU/Linux on Wed Sep 25 2013

BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)

Test System Information

System:	Debian-70-wheezy-64-minimal: GNU/Linux
OS:	GNU/Linux -- 3.2.0-4-amd64 -- #1 SMP Debian 3.2.46-1+deb7u1
Machine:	x86_64: unknown
Language:	en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
CPUs:	0:	Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4770 CPU @ 3.40GHz (6798.8 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
	1:	Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4770 CPU @ 3.40GHz (6799.8 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
	2:	Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4770 CPU @ 3.40GHz (6799.7 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
	3:	Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4770 CPU @ 3.40GHz (6799.8 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
	4:	Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4770 CPU @ 3.40GHz (6799.7 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
	5:	Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4770 CPU @ 3.40GHz (6799.8 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
	6:	Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4770 CPU @ 3.40GHz (6799.8 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
	7:	Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4770 CPU @ 3.40GHz (6799.8 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
Uptime:	09:49:35 up 2:51, 1 user, load average: 0.51, 0.18, 0.09; runlevel 2

Benchmark Run: 8 CPUs; 1 parallel process

Time: 09:49:35 - 10:19:50; 30m 15s

System Benchmarks

Test	Score	Unit	Time	Iters.	Baseline	Index
Dhrystone 2 using register variables	`47239672.9`	`lps`	`10.0 s`	`7`	`116700.0`	`4048.0`
Double-Precision Whetstone	`2966.0`	`MWIPS`	`18.4 s`	`7`	`55.0`	`539.3`
Execl Throughput	`1245.2`	`lps`	`29.8 s`	`2`	`43.0`	`289.6`
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks	`1694600.5`	`KBps`	`30.0 s`	`2`	`3960.0`	`4279.3`
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks	`455347.4`	`KBps`	`30.0 s`	`2`	`1655.0`	`2751.3`
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks	`4103035.1`	`KBps`	`30.0 s`	`2`	`5800.0`	`7074.2`
Pipe Throughput	`3105572.2`	`lps`	`10.0 s`	`7`	`12440.0`	`2496.4`
Pipe-based Context Switching	`57560.1`	`lps`	`10.0 s`	`7`	`4000.0`	`143.9`
Process Creation	`4971.4`	`lps`	`30.0 s`	`2`	`126.0`	`394.6`
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)	`6305.2`	`lpm`	`60.0 s`	`2`	`42.4`	`1487.1`
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)	`6021.1`	`lpm`	`60.1 s`	`2`	`6.0`	`10035.1`
System Call Overhead	`5328584.6`	`lps`	`10.0 s`	`7`	`15000.0`	`3552.4`
System Benchmarks Index Score:						`1646.0`

Benchmark Run: 8 CPUs; 8 parallel processes

Time: 10:19:50 - 10:48:16; 28m 26s

System Benchmarks

Test	Score	Unit	Time	Iters.	Baseline	Index
Dhrystone 2 using register variables	`195656919.3`	`lps`	`10.0 s`	`7`	`116700.0`	`16765.8`
Double-Precision Whetstone	`36892.2`	`MWIPS`	`10.0 s`	`7`	`55.0`	`6707.7`
Execl Throughput	`37932.8`	`lps`	`29.8 s`	`2`	`43.0`	`8821.6`
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks	`1611809.1`	`KBps`	`30.0 s`	`2`	`3960.0`	`4070.2`
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks	`418870.4`	`KBps`	`30.0 s`	`2`	`1655.0`	`2530.9`
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks	`4489293.4`	`KBps`	`30.0 s`	`2`	`5800.0`	`7740.2`
Pipe Throughput	`13392323.1`	`lps`	`10.0 s`	`7`	`12440.0`	`10765.5`
Pipe-based Context Switching	`2801195.6`	`lps`	`10.0 s`	`7`	`4000.0`	`7003.0`
Process Creation	`117073.1`	`lps`	`30.0 s`	`2`	`126.0`	`9291.5`
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)	`62476.0`	`lpm`	`60.2 s`	`2`	`42.4`	`14734.9`
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)	`8269.8`	`lpm`	`60.2 s`	`2`	`6.0`	`13782.9`
System Call Overhead	`9462935.3`	`lps`	`10.0 s`	`7`	`15000.0`	`6308.6`
System Benchmarks Index Score:						`8021.7`

Average of ratings: -