Is this easily at hand? Could you share a link? Thanks
We had the basic license of BB 5.5 for 5 years. We did not use any plugins, encryption, or automated tasks that were integrated with the student information system. We had about 1400-1500 accounts on the system and created about 135 courses per semester.
Maybe this chart will help you--
atw
I also have some slides here from a recent "Case for Moodle" presentation, more on an "Enterprise" level, feel free to use what is useful there (some I borrowed from Jim Farmer's excellent presentations on BB's financials and the general rising costs of US K-30 education.
The Case for Moodle
http://moodle.org/mod/forum/discuss.php?d=42276&parent=202057
Please note that the chart reflects clean installs of both systems, not a migration. That is why the Proprietary System install seems unusually simple.
I will enjoy looking at these slides, also!
atw
Re: Finished Presentation - Need a Few More Answers
d.i.
Re: Finished Presentation - Need a Few More Answers
http://webapp2.cdl.edu/confsys/session_detail.cfm?sessionid=139&OccurrenceID=140
(I keep telling Jay that the .cfm thing in the URLS really would look much prettier if it was .php.
The link doesn't seem to be working. I'd love to see how you've used Jim's material (as I will be doing the same over the summer).
is still no presentation to be found .
http://webapp2.cdl.edu/confsys/session_detail.cfm?sessionid=139&OccurrenceID=140
d.i.
PS: I guess in fairness, it's half that, if you split it across two semesters, and less for summer.
I would like to see if anyone can point me to any research on how much courses in an LMS are really used. I made the courses every semester, but without checking at the end of the term, you don't really know if they were used or not.
I did some analysis on that point and the number of courses that I considered "active" (where students had to log in at least once each week) was extremely low. Of course, we are not talking about on-line courses. I would say that most of ours would be considered hybrid--we meet the class and the LMS supports course materials and out of class activities.
Is that common? Does anyone have any benchmark data? I think a lot of the reason our LMS was not utilized heavily was because there was little in the way of support. Faculty were primarily responsible for their own content--no grad students or any other staff that could come in and build up a course for you.
atw
atw
Could you also share the numerical values for each year with us? It seems the average increase is about 22% per year, which is the same increase that Oracle showed before and during its acquisition of PeopleSoft.
jim farmer
No, I was wrong about the dates. It is a confirmation of the 06-07 pricing. I probably won't know the pricing for 07-08, since we will likely be discontinuing our contract.
2001-2002 and 2002-2003 were the last years you could buy a two year contract, essentially locking in at $5000 per year.
2003-2004 was $7500
2004-2005 was $9500 and that price was also in force for 2005-2006.
The big jump was to $12,500 for 06-07. Although in fairness to the company, they warned us about that almost a year in advance.
Apologies for posting old information. When I realized I had the dates wrong, it was too late to delete the post. New prices for 07-08 should be out by August or September, I think. They let you know early so that you can plan your budgets for software.
atw
Your facts make the discussion of software pricing more precise and less confrontational.
My favorite Daniel Moynihan quote: "Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts."
jim farmer
atw
http://moodle.org/sites/index.php?country=US
Also, if you want to do a head to head comparison of LMS's you can use the following service:
http://www.edutools.info/
take care
frank