Duplicate in the Plugin traffic forum: https://moodle.org/mod/forum/discuss.php?d=471436 where the dev advised to re-report on https://github.com/moodle-an-hochschulen/moodle-tool_redis/issues.
Visvanath Ratnaweera
Mezuen egilea: Visvanath Ratnaweera
A retrospective for our web specialists:

30 Years of <br> Tags
(found in Mastodon, it has been posted in many places, I found out.)
Updated URL: https://www.artmann.co/articles/30-years-of-br-tags.
(Edited by Gareth J Barnard - Link removed as on a mobile device the page redirects to apparent phishing attack sites - original submission Friday, 26 December 2025, 2:30 PM)
(Edited by Gareth J Barnard - Found original post and added URL - original submission Friday, 26 December 2025, 2:30 PM)
A server configuring its network through network managers? Ha, ha, ha!
BTW, there is a Step-by-step Installation Guide for Ubuntu. You can see where the software stack below it ends and where Moodle starts. Please read the docs and previous discussions in this forum and also make use of the forum Advanced search https://moodle.org/mod/forum/search.php?id=5 - for the Moodle-part. But currently the software stack below it, including the operating system and the network configuration, that are missing.
For a quick health check Moodle benchmark is simple and handy. I repeat, it is a quick health check, poor results almost always point to weaknesses in the Moodle instance and the whole underlying layers included. I measures nine things, a major server like yours should not prompt any warnings!
Please note that, no warnings don't mean a scalable server, or you can compare servers on its final result. What is does, in my observation, is to check for some obvious weaknesses. Yours shouldn't have any. You can post the result if you want, or compare the results with the hundreds of results other have posted in this forum.