Joseph Rézeau

Bonjour Etienne,
Etant donné que je n'ai toujours pas compris l'intérêt du SCORM, ce n'est pas moi qui répondrai à ta question.
Bonne journée,
Joseph

>I'm talking about the questionaire templates.

You should have said so earlier... Anyway, I do not see the problem. The questionnaire templates are created like ordinary templates, by choosing Add an activity -> Questionnaire in a course on your moodle site. Simply locate those you want to delete and delete them. Of course, you'll have to locate the course where they have been originally created.

Joseph

Andrei,
Please post here the reference of the bug in the tracker.
Joseph

Hi Daniele,

1- First problem

In your previous post you wrote "I still can find at row 1918 <td colspan=2 align="left">" I answered that there was no validation problem with that code. Now you write that the problem is with <td colspan=2 align="left"><b>. Do you mean that it is the <b> tag which is not correct? In fact, although it is recommended that the <b> tag should be replaced with the (semantic) <strong > tag, the <b> tag is still allowed in XHTML 1.x Strict. What more can I say? We are not (yet) aiming at XHTML 2.0 I think.

In any case, it does not matter because - as you have found out, "the function mkresrank is never executed". There are still a number of obsolete or redundant code lines in the Questionnaire module, because that module has beeen modified a lot over the years, and I have concentrated my efforts for XHTML 1.x Strict validation on the code which really gets executed. I checked all pages with http://validator.w3.org/check.

2. Second problem

You are right about the "Your responses - view x" page (myreport.php). There was an extra </div> tag in line 86, which I have removed. I have committed the change to contrib (for 1.8). Thanks for pointing out the bug.

Thanks for your help and please post any other problems you notice regarding XHTML 1.x Strict validation.

Joseph

Hi Harry,
The Questionnaire module does not incorporate branching questions at the moment, and I am not aware that this is planned. It sounds like a useful function, but would probably entail massive recoding of the module.
Joseph
PS.- I hope this reply is "polite" enough.