Joseph Rézeau

Bonjour Christine,
S'il s'agit uniquement de sauvegarder les devoirs des étudiants, notre admin a mis au point un petit plugin à usage interne qui ajoute cette possibilité dans chaque activité "devoir" de notre Moodle. C'est très pratique. Je vais lui demander s'il veut bien s'inscrire à ce forum francophone et éventuellement partager son plugin.
Si pour un même "devoir" plusieurs "copies" ont été rendues, elles se trouvent dans le même sous-dossier. Dans l'archive zip téléchargée, on trouve, pour le devoir en question, un dossier par étudiant, avec, à l'intérieur, le ou les copies rendues.
Bien entendu, il faut recommencer l'opération pour chacun des "devoirs" du cours, il n'y a pas d'option pour zipper et télécharger d'un seul coup l'ensemble des devoirs d'un cours.
Joseph

Lezlie: "I believe the glossary will already do this. We use Moodle 1.9. My linked glossary definitions used to appear with a mouse-over without the need to open in a new window."

As fas as I can remember this is not true. The standard behavior of glossary auto-links is for the user to click the hyperlinked word, which opens up the relevant glossary definition in a popup window. There is not setting to show the definition on mouse hover, this is why I proposed a hack in MDL-18213.

Joseph

Hi Ellyn,

Glad you got the answer to your question.

However, may I point out that it is customary, in these forums, when you get an answer to a question either directly from someone or because your worked it out for yourself, to post that answer in the forum discussion you started. Just in case someone else may have the same question and would like to know the answer.

Please post that answer,

TIA

Joseph

Hi Dom,

Unfortunately the (long) information you attached to your post does not help much to understand your problem.

It is always extremely difficult to pinpoint a problem which, as you state in your report, sometimes happens and sometimes does not happen. It's up to you to try and find out what was different in those cases, so that we can have a diagnostic.

Here are a few ideas and queries for more relevant info.

Which version of Moodle are you using?

Did you recently upgrade your Moodle?

Are you using the very latest version of Questionnaire?

Did you have that problem just on ONE questionnaire on your Moodle site or on more than one?

Tell us about the settings of the "problematic" questionnaire: does it have more than one page? It is set as Save/Resume answers?

Is it a public questionnaire created in one course, then used in other courses on your Moodle site?

When you write "...we have started finding that teachers are claiming to have completed the questionnaire and yet we dont get SOME of those answers, other results ARE coming in."do you mean:

a- you are getting the responses from some respondents (teachers) but no responses from some other respondents

b. OR you are getting, for all or some of the respondents, all of their responses in the questionnaire OR only some of their responses?

For those teachers who "claim to have responded", have you checked their activity report in the Moodle course where that questionnaire is located? In the activity report you can view the exact timestamp where they submitted the questionnaire.

The more relevant information you give the better the chances are that we can help you, but again, the worst case to diagnose is when something "sometimes works and sometimes does not".

ATB

Joseph

In some places in Moodle there is no HTML editor available, but a teacher may need to use HTML tags for formatting the text, e.g. in MCQ questions choices text, etc.

I have just found out that the rendering of at least 2 tags (italics and bold) does not work as expected, indeed works in a weird way in 2.0 as compared to 1.9 where it is OK.

Here is the HTML code entered in a text box and below a screen shot of 1.9 and 2.0 renderings.

<strong>strong</strong>, <b>b</b>, <i>i</i>,<em>em</em>, <strong><em>strong and em</em></strong>, <b><i>b and i</i></b>, <b><em>b and em</em></b>, <em><b>em and b</b></em>, <i><b>i and b</b></i>, <em><strong>em and strong</strong></em>

Any idea, anyone?

Joseph