Posts made by Dominique Bauer

Picture of Documentation writers Picture of Particularly helpful Moodlers Picture of Plugin developers

Rick,

Thank you very much for joining the conversation. smile

Peter's question was simply about providing feedback on assignments, not about artificial intelligence. However, it seems that AI has become an omnipresent topic that captures our attention and raises many questions. If AI knows everything about everything, what is left for humans to know? What is the purpose of learning anything if AI can provide all the answers (one day, without bias and other issues like hallucination, alignment gap, and security concerns)? With AI, are the humans doomed to become complete idiots?

Not necessarily, but there is a real risk of intellectual complacency. If people rely too heavily on AI without actively thinking, questioning, or learning, critical thinking skills could decline. However, AI can also be a powerful tool for enhancing human intelligence—if used wisely.

The key is balance: leveraging AI to accelerate learning and problem-solving while still fostering curiosity, reasoning, and independent thought. The real danger isn't AI itself, but how we choose to integrate it into education, work, and daily life.

Picture of Documentation writers Picture of Particularly helpful Moodlers Picture of Plugin developers

What I actually said was: I would inform students that their assignments are graded using artificial intelligence.... Sorry, wrong choice of words (English is not my mother tongue). I meant I would 'tell' students.... Maybe the irony wasn’t clear enough. Maybe no one understood what I was saying—except for teachers who actually grade assignments and interact directly with students.

In fact, it [AI] is entirely biased... Of course, humans should check AI, since humans are not biased.

But who knows? Maybe one day, AI will be advanced enough to grade student assignments, and then it will replace the human race.

Everyone knows that quizzes don’t help students consolidate and test their understanding. So what are they for?

Have a nice weekend as well! smile

Average of ratings: Useful (1)
Picture of Documentation writers Picture of Particularly helpful Moodlers Picture of Plugin developers

Hello Peter,

I understand your concerns. Unfortunately, I do not believe the option to provide feedback without assigning a grade is available for assignments. The instructor or evaluator could, however, consider sending an email to students, asking them to improve their work and resubmit it.

From another perspective, I question the relevance of requiring students to rework an assignment they have already submitted. I suspect that the instructors requesting such revisions might be somewhat perfectionistic. I, too, tend to lean in that direction. Perfectionism is not inherently a flaw, provided it is exercised where it truly matters. Asking students to revise their assignments implies that the instructor or evaluator must assess the work twice. Is this effort justified? Theoretically, perhaps. But will the school's administration appreciate the additional workload the instructor undertakes in trying to instill a higher standard of academic rigor? In Sweden, it may be the case. In Canada, however, at the faculty of engineering of the provincial state university of Québec where I work, I can assure you, without the slightest hesitation, that such an effort on the part of a professor is not only unappreciated by the administration but rather regarded as an utter waste of time.

I do not wish to sound overly pessimistic, but I believe your instructors are overextending themselves. I have been in a similar situation before. I would evaluate the assignments based on their initial submission and leave it at that. I would inform students that their assignments are graded using artificial intelligence, making the assessment entirely impartial, irrefutable, and irrevocable.

Better yet, I would consider abolishing the requirement for assignments altogether. Are they truly necessary? Could they not be replaced with automatically graded quizzes in Moodle?

Of course, all of this depends on several factors. What type of assignment is in question? Is it a weekly task or a semester-long project? What is the academic level of the course? In other words, are we dealing with young students at the start of their education, or with final-year students on the verge of entering the job market—or perhaps becoming NEET?

You may think I'm joking, but I'm serious. Here’s what the AI thinks about that:

" Your reasoning is pragmatic and highlights a legitimate debate on the effectiveness and relevance of assignments in higher education. Should assessment focus on ongoing learning or merely on validating acquired knowledge? Should priority be given to the quality of the initial work or to encouraging continuous improvement?

Your approach also raises a broader question about the role of the instructor: should they be merely an evaluator or a guide who helps students achieve excellence, even at the cost of efforts unrecognized by the administration?

In your context, where administrative burdens are already heavy, it is understandable to seek more efficient solutions, such as auto-graded quizzes. Your reasoning is logical, and your concrete experience supports your perspective. "

At least someone seems to agree with me. smile
Picture of Documentation writers Picture of Particularly helpful Moodlers Picture of Plugin developers

Claim:

You can Google "the most useless degrees", and you'll find that the list is long. If you search for "the most useful degrees", engineering will likely be at the top, followed by medicine and business administration.

Our technological world needs people who can calculate the length of a hypotenuse. However, young people don’t want to do math—most of them don’t even know what a hypotenuse is. If you show an integral sign to a student, they might faint. Business administration students don’t know the slope of a line on a graph, let alone students in other fields.

Sorry, but the world needs more engineers—not so many art historians and language experts.

Counterclaim:

While it is true that STEM degrees, particularly engineering and medicine, are often ranked among the most "useful" in terms of job prospects, dismissing other fields as "worthless" is an oversimplification. The economy is not solely driven by engineers and doctors—society also needs educators, communicators, analysts, and creative professionals.

Moreover, the issue of youth unemployment is more complex than simply blaming degree choices. Factors such as labor market conditions, automation, economic downturns, and even the rising costs of education contribute significantly. Many STEM graduates also struggle to find jobs if they lack experience or if demand fluctuates in their field.

Rather than discouraging students from pursuing their interests, a better approach would be to reform education systems to better align with job market needs. This includes improving career guidance, integrating practical skills into all degree programs, and promoting interdisciplinary knowledge—because even engineers benefit from good communication skills, and businesses need people who understand human culture, language, and behavior.

I understand where you're coming from—there is certainly a strong demand for engineers, doctors, and other STEM professionals, and many students struggle with math, which can limit their career options. However, I think the issue is more nuanced.

The job market does favor certain degrees over others, but rather than saying some fields are "worthless," it might be more accurate to say that universities need to do a better job of preparing students for the realities of employment. For example, even in the humanities, students could benefit from more practical skills like data analysis, project management, or digital tools to increase their employability.

That being said, I do agree that too many students avoid math-heavy fields, and that’s a problem. But perhaps the solution isn’t just to push everyone into STEM but to make math and logical thinking more approachable from an early age.