Hi Tim,
Thank you for confirming the bit about the p-value / Facility index. Strangely enough, we have people who struggle to see the relation between a 0.38 and 38 % value, which to me is exactly the same thing. They're also quite particular about the way these values are named: in their literature terminology from my original post is commonly used, whereas Moodle uses more 'user-friendly' labelling to know what a value represents. Some 'translation' from technical term to common sense description is then required. Other eAssessment platforms just stick to the technical terms, because that's what Assessment Specialists here are used to.
I found the documentation you shared, and will forward this to my colleagues.
Thank you for confirming the bit about the p-value / Facility index. Strangely enough, we have people who struggle to see the relation between a 0.38 and 38 % value, which to me is exactly the same thing. They're also quite particular about the way these values are named: in their literature terminology from my original post is commonly used, whereas Moodle uses more 'user-friendly' labelling to know what a value represents. Some 'translation' from technical term to common sense description is then required. Other eAssessment platforms just stick to the technical terms, because that's what Assessment Specialists here are used to.
I found the documentation you shared, and will forward this to my colleagues.