Guilty on count 2.

....mercy
point 1.
On the contrary, I believe that students can be let down as much by too
low expectations as they can by too high expectations. Many women have
experienced the deadening effect of underestimation of potential IMHO -
I know that I have.
AS one professor used to insist, if he did not understand our point then we must say- Sir, i failed to make myself clear.
So here i say that i failed to make my poitn clear.
You are correct that
students can be let down as much by too
low expectation because once again, the same mechanism is in force that was working when the teacher trashes their assignment for being below par. The individual feels rejected and usually fails to understand that it is the single instance of bad assignment that was trashed, not him/her.
The teacher or anyone in authority has to walk a fine line. Too low expectations tend to say-''I have already written you off. You are no good''
High expectations and trashing says:'' you are below what is expected of you. You are no good''
In fact, in this view, having higher expectations is better than having low expectations.
But what i had meant was NOT to have expectations. Let them perform at their own level and gently goad them to next higher level from the one they are performing at now.
p.s. when i say 'you' occasionally, I don't mean Frances. I mean general community.
n.b. by calling my communication robust , i guess what you meant was 'not mincing words, bordering on rude'....didn't you?

but whats the point of having conversations without passion
regards and ciao