David Scotson

Hi Mary,

just saw that. Still not clear to me why javascript is to blame for this?

If dragging and dropping into new sections was responsible then it would have to be present regardless of whether a label was there or not. All I see is the empty ul tag in that situation.

It's not for drag and drop. It's just the class for wrapping the icon and name/link for activity instances. Labels have been kind of shoe-horned in to where there would normally be an activity item so there's a few weird things in the CSS that'll catch you out as you try to style one or the other (since they are two quite different things) and accidentally affect both.

The other weird thing is some of the CSS is also shared between editing mode and non-editing mode. This 3em padding seems designed to put some space between the activity name and the activity editing icons. So it should really only be applied on the editing page I think.

Just for info, H.264 can be lossless, though you'll have trouble playing those files in most situations as it's an unusual use case which isn't well supported. However, I was talking about "visually lossless", which is different:

http://www.digitizationguidelines.gov/term.php?term=compressionvisuallylossless

Nice. For large icons you could look for the extra classes on this page:

http://fortawesome.github.io/Font-Awesome/examples/

So examples would be:

[icon-camera-retro icon-large]
[icon-camera-retro icon-2x]
[icon-camera-retro icon-3x]
[icon-camera-retro icon-4x]

The icon-fixed-width one is probably very useful too, and support for rotating and spinning would be a fun demo.

Oh, an icon filter. That's a good idea.