Moodle plugins directory: Questionnaire | Moodle.org
Questionnaire
Activities ::: mod_questionnaire
Maintained by Mike Churchward
Custom Survey Creation
Latest release:
15897 sites
3k downloads
230 fans
Current versions available: 19
Create your own surveys using this tool.
SUPPORT DISCUSSION: http://moodle.org/mod/forum/view.php?id=2642
DEVELOPERS NOTE - Questionnaire is tracked in Github at https://github.com/remotelearner/moodle-mod_questionnaire. Contact Mike Churchward if you want "push" access.
(originally based on phpESP)
/plugins/mod
Contributors
Mike Churchward (Lead maintainer)
Joseph Rézeau: Former co-maintainer
Please login to view contributors details and/or to contact them
It's on its way. In the meantime, the latest version of Questionnaire 2.6 does work on a Moodle 2.7 site (it only throws a couple of warnings).
The capability "mod/questionnaire:createpublic" is partially what UNSW are after. They would like another capability to control whether you can use a public questionnaire. In version 2.5.5, my public questionnaires appear under 'Copy Existing'?
Also, 2.7 version with new logging is likely to be weeks or months away?
When will the version for 2.7 be ready?
In the version for 2.6 (2014041801), when you add an essay box, the user cannot upload an image. When you click 'find or upload image' it does nothing.
Thanks,
Andrea
Thanks
Can you please change the functionality to match what the tool advertises?
A workaround is to use the import function in Excel to convert the file to CSV, but this is more cumbersome than just generating a CSV. Thank you!
Laura Farvour
Around line 72 of locallib.php the "never" option seems to have been dropped from the array:
$questionnaireresponseviewers =
array ( QUESTIONNAIRE_STUDENTVIEWRESPONSES_NEVER => get_string('responseviewstudentsnever', 'questionnaire'),
I just put that back on our installation and it all works as expected. The strings are still there and the behavior on the front end for students works, so code controling the view must still be using this.
I am wondering if this was just an error or whether it was removed from the code deliberately?