I have been doing some reading and thinking. I do this sometimes.
I was reading W. Olaf Stapledon (Last and First Men - 1930) and came
across the following:
"`telepathic' intercourse had resulted in a true group-mind, a single
physical process embodied in the electro-magnetic radiation of the
whole race; but the group-mind was inferior in calibre to the
individual minds." p. 240.
Whilst Stapledon ascribed his original 'group-mind' to his Martians, in
this instance he was referring to his Fifth Men (on earth).
Whilst, I do not claim to have telepathic capabilities I feel
Stapledon's reference may be equaly applicable to our ever evolving
ability to communicate globally.
Most Wiki's work on the basis of 'last-in-best-dressed'. By this I mean
they tend to offer just one version of truth (sans ascribtion). Alternatively the wiki may be used on the basis of "last-in-best-dressed-up" if used collaboratively so that all voices and perspectives are retained by always 'adding' to the wiki sans deletions.
Blog's on the other hand represent personal truths - as such they are
infallible.
What is the best way to develop shared truth (knowledge) and values?
Should we concentrate on search technqiues that extract, analyse and
synthesise truth from on-line blogs or do we develop Wiki's that allow
for a variety of perpsecitive?
For instance, MS word has an 'autosummarise' function that extracts meaning from a large document. Does similar search technology exist to extract themes, common perspectives and counterpoints from Blog sites or online forums?
Maybe you could dicuss some of this with your students?
I would also be interested in pesonal viewpoints.