Ver 3.1
I ran a quiz for 192 students. The quiz was set up with questions in groups of 5, and in each group, only the first question was visible, with each next question becoming visible only when the previous question was answered. (I did this by using the Layout / Navigation Method / Free and Question Behaviour / How Questions Behave / Immediate Feedback and then using the lock).
For all students, this worked fine, except:
Problem 1:
Student A calls an invigilator with two problems:
- In the first part of the quiz, many of his questions have already been answered, but not by him.
- The later portion of the quiz has all the questions visible to him, even though he has not yet answered the qualifying questions.
We log him out of Moodle and then back in. Problem still exists.
We then move him to another machine, he logs in, and, again, the problem still persists.
So, I quickly set up one of the invigilators as a student in my course, she logs in, and the student completes the quiz, no problem.
Problem 2:
When I come to check the marks in the exported spreadsheet, I know to copy the marks from the invigilator's row to his row. Problem is, he is listed in the spreadsheet, with a full row of marks, even for those questions that I know he did not answer. The logs show him as having logged in at the correct time of the quiz, and answering all the questions over 1.5 hours, even though we know he was in the quiz for a max of 20 minutes.
So, how did he get those marks?
Problem 3:
Student B whom I know was at the exam, has a blank row of marks. Nothing at all. I check the logs, and there is no record that Student B was at the exam. Given the time shown on the Student A marks, it is likely that the marks showing for Student A come from Student B.
Now, even if they had somehow colluded, it would not explain how Student A was able to see all the questions even though he had not answered the qualifying questions.
So, I desperately need to find out what has happened, because the implications obviously go way beyond this one quiz and these two students. (And right now, can I be absolutely certain that those marks recorded for Student A actually do come from Student B?)
I have not yet had a chance to raise this with our technical staff, so it would be useful if I had some insight beforehand to ask them to look for possible solutions and preventative action.
Any ideas would be helpful.
Thanks.