Moodle for mobile

Hi All,

I'm working on enabling one of my activity modules for MoodleMobile. I've got the development environment set up and working with MoodleMobile running in Chromium, this successfully connects to my Moodle test systems. This wasn't too painful since I've already written a few Android apps from scratch, one of which was done with Cordova.

I've got a basic module set up and have put in the appropriate zip file and db/mobile.php entry. When I start up MoodleMobile, I can see from my webserver log that the zip file is downloaded, so clearly the set up to tell MoodleMobile that the remote addon is available is working and I get Registered addon messages for course content, prefetch and link handler in the browser console.

However, that's the extent of what I can get to work. The icon which I defined in the handler getController method isn't used (I still see the jigsaw piece icon for an unsupported module) and when I click on the activity I get the "You can still use it using your devices browser" message, although the earlier part about the mod not being supported and contacting your sysadmin is now missing, which suggests that the module is being partially detected at this point causing that message to be hidden. There is not nothing else which relates to the module, so I can only assume that something critical is missing, but I'm at a loss as to what that could be since I've largely copied the page module code verbatim (with appropriate adjustments to the mod name.

So the question is, how do validate the basic structure of the plugin so I can work out what is wrong, or trigger an error message that gives me a clue,

Thanks in anticipation!

Average of ratings: -

Hi Tim,

good job getting this far! Let's see if we can fix this problem.

The service responsible of handling the activities is $mmCourseDelegate, so that's one of the places to look. I'd add some more console.log in$mmCourseDelegate#updateContentHandlers and $mmCourseDelegate#updateContentHandler to make sure your activity is enabled (added to enabledHandlers). If the activity is not added to enabledHandlers then it probably means that the isEnabled function in your activity is returning false, you should check why is that. Maybe some missing WebService? If the activity is added to enabledHandlers, then check that the function$mmCourseDelegate#getContentHandlerControllerFor is able to retrieve the handler (maybe the name is not the same?).

If you want to have access to enabledHandlers from the browser console you can just do something like this in the service:

window.enabledHandlers = enabledHandlers;

That way you'll have a global variable that can be accessed via the console.

I hope this helps you!

Dani

Average of ratings: -
Hi Dani,

Thanks for your help. I've added in a load of extra logging as you suggested to $mmCourseDelegate. With the extra debugging, I can see that all of the internal mods are processed by the updateContentHandler method prior to the point where my module is registered. Looking at the log output I see the following immediately after the 3 Registered log entries for my addon:$mmEvents: Event remote_addons_loaded triggered.
$mmCoursePrefetchDelegate: Updating prefetch handlers for current site. Since my addon contains a content handler, I would also have expected the "Updating content handlers for current site." log entry to be sent, followed by a repeat of the earlier log entires for all the handlers, but with my addon included. However, that doesn't happen. I tried disabling the prefetch handler in my addon config and this caused the content handler registration to be re-run (a minor triumph). So the immediate problem is that my prefetch handler is causing a problem, which might be because I've not written the webservice yet. I'm going to leave the prefetch code for now, since I wasn't going to look at this as the first task. However, my addon still fails to activate and the updateContentHandler method never calls the isEnabled method on my addon. As far as I can tell, it fails on this line: handlerInfo.instance =$mmUtil.resolveObject(handlerInfo.handler, true);

The console.log prior to this line is displayed, but the one immediately after it is never printed. Digging into the $mmUtil.resolveObject method, I added some more logging output. The method gets to this line and silently fails, with none of the following logging output being generated: resolved =$injector.get(toInject[0]);

I tried sticking a try-catch around this to see if there was an exception that was being suppressed somewhere higher up, but got nothing. I haven't as yet been able to identify where $injector comes from, so that's as far as I can get trying to debug this. Any advice gratefully received! Average of ratings: - Re: Debugging remote add--ons Hi Tim, that's weird. Can you send me the main.js and the handlers.js files in your plugin? You can send them to mobile@moodle.com. I'll check if I see why is it failing. Cheers, Dani Average of ratings: - Re: Debugging remote add--ons Actually I think I've found the initial problem, I was using the manual packaging procedure described here: https://docs.moodle.org/dev/Moodle_Mobile_Remote_add-ons and I hadn't fully appreciated the step which said "place all the JavaScript code of your addon in a single file named addon.js. This file needs to be in your addon's root folder." I didn't realise that it meant to duplicate absolutely everything, I thought it just related to the content of main.js, so I was making addon.js as a copy of main.js. Which begs the question as to why this duplication step is necessary, it seems like a redundant thing to do, when all the original js files are included in the final zip as well but seemingly not used. Is this forced upon you by the angular.js framework, or was it a deliberate decision for reasons I have yet to understand? The module now seems to be starting up. I've still got some issues, which might be the subject of a further post, but I'm also getting meaningful error messages from the console so I'm going to work through them first. Thanks again, hopefully I'll now have something working soon! Average of ratings: - Re: Debugging remote add--ons Hi Tim, I'm glad you found the problem! Placing all the code in a single file was a deliberate decision we made. It has 2 reasons: 1. The app only needs to execute 1 file that has a fixed name, there's no need to iterate over all the files in the ZIP file and execute them. 2. We can control the order of the file content, so the module declaration (main.js) is at the start of the file. Otherwise we'd have to look for the main.js (it could have a different name!) and load it first. Please notice we have a gulp task to automatically build the remote addon, and this process already creates this addon.js file. Please see: Kind regards, Dani Average of ratings: - Re: Debugging remote add--ons Yes, I'm now using the gulp task to do this. I see your point about addon.js, but it's making debugging a real pain, since the line numbers I get are in addon.js rather than the actual line number from the real file. So I have to extract the addon.js from the zip file, find the line and then search for it in the actual source code. Is there any way of persuading MoodleMobile to work with the real files and ignore addon.js in a some kind of debug mode? Also, if the other js files aren't used, why are they still included in the addon.js by the gulp task? Surely they should be excluded. Average of ratings: - Re: Debugging remote add--ons Hi Tim, to debug the addon we recommend you to test it in the development environment, before building the addon. We always try to debug it in Chromium because it's faster, but some issues can only be reproduced in a real device. If the error only happens after the addon is built then there is no other choice as checking the addon.js file, I'm sorry. Regarding not including the JS files, you're right. I created an issue: Thanks, Dani Average of ratings: - Re: Debugging remote add--ons Re addons.js, I can see that some developers may prefer to split there code up, but I like to keep things as simple and direct as possible. Is there any reason why I shouldn't simply put all my code into addons.js to start with and dispense with the gulp build process since the only thing it does from my point of view is to complicate debugging, something I'm already finding to be quite a painful process. I've got Chromium set up all ready, it helps a bit, but I'm finding MoodleMobile addon development to be very difficult to get to grips with. I've written an Android apps from scratch using Cordova as well as having done Apps directly using straight java code so I'm not unfamiliar with phone app development. I think my main complaint is that it's very difficult to identify where problems are if you haven't set something up right. That will probably get easier as I learn more, but the learning curve is extremely steep compared what I'm used to when learning something new. Average of ratings: - Re: Debugging remote add--ons Hi Tim, if an addon is simple then it might be easier to put all the code in the addon.js file. We like to keep it in different files because it's easier to maintain and work with, at least for us. For example, mod/assign has thousands of lines of code. If someone has to implement a complex module like this one, it will be way easier to work with if the files are split instead of having a single file with thousands of lines. Please take into account that the gulp task does more things besides building the addon.js file. It also compiles the sass files into a css file, and treats the language files to add the required prefix. We know it's hard to start with MoodleMobile development, specially because there are a lot of different libraries and frameworks involved: cordova, angular, ionic, npm, bower, gulp, etc. Our gulp tasks were created because it is a must to be able to keep code split into separate files, and we don't want to include hundreds of files into the Mobile app (and in case of remote addons this becomes even harder for the reasons I explained in a previous post). Ionic 3 by default also has a build task to compile everything into a single file, so it's not just us. Kind regards, Dani Average of ratings: - Re: Debugging remote add--ons In which case a "debug" mode where plugins can be run "raw" so that you can see the real line numbers and source of the errors seems like an essential addition. Other software which has this kind of consolidation for performance will usually have such a mode to make development easier so that you can directly trace errors to the original source. Average of ratings: - Re: Debugging remote add--ons My other suggestion is that you need to give more consideration to finding ways to lower the barriers inherent in writing a remote addon. One of the joys of working with Moodle is that for the most part plugin development has quite a low barrier of entry, but it doesn't feel that way with MoodleMobile. The basic build environment and dev tools needed aren't much of a issue (at least for me), it's not so different to stuff I've dealt with before. I can live with debugging issues caused by code consolidation for addon.js, it's irritating and costs extra time but I know how to work around it. What I'm finding difficult is getting my head around how MoodleMobile "hangs together", the execution paths are not at all clear to me and this leads to debugging even simple problems being very time consuming. I'm not saying the design is in any way wrong, it's just feels really alien compared to what I'm used to both in Moodle and with the other mobile development work that I've done and right now there just isn't enough documentation explaining how things work to be able to get past that barrier. It feels like you need a very deep understanding of MoodleMobile in order to write addons, far deeper than is necessary for regular Moodle plugins. I've followed the existing tutorials, but they give me very little handle on what to do when something doesn't work as expected or how to go beyond the very specific examples. If there is more out there, please point me at it, because my extensive searches have failed to find it. I have delved into the MoodleMobile source code, but there aren't enough comments in it really help. For me, if you want to encourage existing plugin developers to support the app, then you need to find ways to make it easier for them to do so, since I suspect many of the developers who write Moodle plugins will hit the same roadblock which I feel that I'm hitting. I can get past this if I choose to invest the time, but the question I'm now having to ask myself is if it's worth the effort to do so. I'd like to add mobile app support, but cost of adding it is far higher than I initially anticipated. This is not a complaint or a request for a major design change, just a point for discussion which I hope will inform future development decision. Average of ratings: - Re: Debugging remote add--ons Hi Tim, yes, we are aware that developing remote add-ons it's not easy at all. We are working on several ways to try to improve it, we are targeting Moodle 3.5 for a solution (something like developing server-side PHP code so app pages can be rendered on the server) I'll publish in the forum soon about our plans to the new Moodle Mobile app (updated to Ionic3) Juan Average of ratings: - Re: Debugging remote add--ons Thanks Juan, my second comment above was written before seeing this. I'll look forward to the improvements. My secondary concern is that this seems to be a bit of an afterthought, when it should have been part of the initial design process. On thing that would be really handy right now would be a better tutorial. The existing tutorial doesn't cover what I suspect most developers are going to want to do, which is to add Mobile support to an existing activity module. The choice of a notes module which seems to be divorced from a specific activity is rather curious. Trying to decypher what's going for an activity module on by looking at the code of an existing activity module is far from easy. A stripped down "fill in the blanks template" which contains the minimum quantity of code with plenty of comments telling you what each bit does would be really handy. Average of ratings: - Re: Debugging remote add--ons I'm having another look at this to see if I can make a "breakthrough" and make something work. After adding extensive debug logging messages, I've traced a possible reason why the remote addon still fails to do anything. In the index controller fetchContent method (copied more or less verbatim from the Page module), there is the following call: promises.push($mmaModHelixmedia.getPageHtml(module.contents, module.id).then ( .....

The problem seems to be that module.contents is undefined, this causes the getPageHtml to throw an exception. This implies a failure earlier on in the code where the following call is executed:

As far as I can tell neither of the methods in the webservice php code (which is a copy of the code from the page module) is actually called when the download is invoked, although by looking at the logs and by using wireshark to analyse the interaction with the server there does seem to be a call to "core_course_get_contents" when I click on an instance of my module in MoodleMobile, but nothing else. Any light which you can shed on this would be much appreciated.

Average of ratings: -

Hi Tim,

when a Page is opened in the app, we always downloads all its files so they'r available offline. The list of files to download is inside module.contents.

For example, in one of the pages in my local site, module.contents has a list like this (I removed some fields to make it more readable):

[
]

This module.contents is returned by the WebService you mentioned: core_course_get_contents. If you're planning to make your module work like page, you should check why the WebService isn't returning the list of files. You can find the implementation of the WebService in here. You should look at this part.

If you're planning to debug the WebService, please notice that you can call it via CURL or even performing a GET request using the browser, it's usually faster than using the app.

Please let us know if you have any problem or you don't manage to make this work

Kind regards,

Dani

Average of ratings: -