Moodle Forums......

Re: Moodle Forums......

by Derek Chirnside -
Number of replies: 7

Surely Martin this process of migration would be quite database intensive, but actually straightforward, like a simple mapping of forum settings and transfer of post data.  I'm not sure if this is a showstopper.

I've been waiting to see the outcome of a conversation between you and Sam's boss.  I notice you have some problems with NG's code.  I'd be interested in what this means.

And also the interface. (Cluttered).  Point taken, but in a hypothetical future with NG, this is surely part of the process.  Really, where is the adequate evaluation of NG.

Re Advanced forums.  I have not seen these, so I have no point of comparison.  I am interested to note this tracker item: https://tracker.moodle.org/browse/MDL-39707 (evaluating Advanced forums for incorperating into Moodle core) and https://tracker.moodle.org/browse/MDLSITE-1910 (some for Moodle.org)

I'm concerned that putting effort into cobbling together enhancements for Standard forums are making decisions by default, and it will be using valuable coding time.  I wonder what has bumped subscriptions to be 'critical' for Moodle.org, which I see as a philosophical shift.  I support this: but not at the cost of clear thinking on a way ahead with forums.

I've also noticed this: https://tracker.moodle.org/browse/CONTRIB-3681 where Sam has basically moved on with work on this thing (an evil hack that I have no idea of the significance of it).  I hope this does not mean development of NG is stalled outside OU for migration to future versions of Moodle.

My final comment: we've had a number of conversations about the functionality of the ideal forum.  Here we come to the old issue of one person's vital is another person's essential.  How we come to consensus about this is still a question.  I've had my say about this elsewhere (drafts, 1<>1 options, inline, tags etc) but we could be wasting time developing lots of single issue developments and merely bolting them onto existing forums.

Is there anywhere public where we can check out MR advanced forums?  Is there something in the way of user notes?

I do not think we should underestimate the significance of this issue of getting a decent forum into Moodle core.  In Most settings, online, forums are a key component of an LMS.  Functionality, simplicity and power (or lack of it) is a big factor in how easy it is for tutors and lecturers to manage dialogue.  Just one illustration of what I mean.  Currently, click reply and you loose the view of the whole thread.  The inline reply of an AJAX version has huge power for many users.  To say OK, use tabs, cut and paste etc is fine, it puts a consistent overhead on the activity of everybody.

We have yet to have any discussions on what the best for the end user really is in terms of the learning and interaction.

Is this correct? - our options fix existing forums (may incorperating some bits like AF from MR) (maybe getting input from HSU read later etc) or incorperate NG (after a develop) and offer a migrate process.

Off my soapbox now.  As with Buddy, we are also following this conversation with interest.

-Derek

 

In reply to Derek Chirnside

Re: Moodle Forums......

by Jason Hardin -

Moodlerooms Advanced forums can be used at http://demo2k12.moodlerooms.com/.

Organizations interested in Joule features and possible hosting can also request a 15 day trial of Joule as well. The 15 day trial will be their own site to play with where the above link is like demo.moodle.org and gets recreated every 12 hours. There are also several videos on Youtube just search for advanced forums.

Both of these options provide a demo of all of the features we are suggesting be part of Moodle core, activity grading interface, advanced forums, alerts and streams, and outcomes (as of July 13th when we release it to our clients).

Because advanced forums is a separate forum type we have never recreated the forum search functionality or the display posts in the user's profile. This would all come by moving Advanced forums back to a core forum. As I said the migration would be as simple as search and replace hsuforum with forum in the code.

Nothing currently exists in Advanced forums for user notes beyond adding the notes block to a forum. https://tracker.moodle.org/browse/MDL-39707 lists all the features that have been added beyond core forums with the exception of manual grading through the activity grader interface. Which as Martin stated is not included because AGI is not in core.
As for the lose of the reply I agree that is the one feature that Forum NG has the I want to add to Advanced forum's nested view. It is my opinion that if you combine Forum NG's inline reply with Advanced forum's Nested view (AJAX load of forum and replies on demand) you would never use any other forum view unless you were visually disabled.

One thing that both advanced forums and forum NG fail at is an accessible view of the forums. I have seen nothing from OU in this respect for forums, but I know we will be implementing this functionality by August in advanced forums. Again as per the ticket above the design will be based on http://blog.bargirangin.com/2013/03/a-model-for-accessible-lms-discussion.html. I still need to get a public specification for this, working towards this by the first week of June. Multiple display options to me is a huge advantage of advanced forums over forum NG. A user is allowed to pick a view of the forums that is most productive for them.

In reply to Jason Hardin

Re: Moodle Forums......

by Derek Chirnside -

Jason, I will check this out at the weekend.  (Busy in a big writing project at the moment)

Accessibility: just because we haven't seen anything from OU doesn't mean they have not got something.  They often have in house tweaks and addons to solve problems the rest of us live with.

Re other comments + information, food for thought, THANKS.

-Derek

 

In reply to Derek Chirnside

Re: Moodle Forums......

by Tim Hunt -
Picture of Core developers Picture of Documentation writers Picture of Particularly helpful Moodlers Picture of Peer reviewers Picture of Plugin developers

Some of the folks in the OU's Institute of educational technology are experts on accessibility and assistive technologies.

The regularly review parts of our VLE, and since Forum NG is one of the main tools used by students, it has been reviewed several time, and the accessibility problems fixed.

(IET reviews and testing have also fed into accessibility improvements in core Moodle over the years.)

So, if nothing else, ForumNG is very accessible.

The other area where ForumNG has more features than standard forum (in addition to student-visible features that everyone wants like subscribe to thread) is in the moderation features. Some of our courses are very big, and have very high traffic, and we insist on moderating them, sometime by teams of people. So, for example, when a post is 'deleted' by one moderator, it is actually only hidden, and another moderator could review that decision, and undelete the post. You can also delete any post, even if it has been replied to. You can subscribe to a group in a forum, if you have access to multiple groups and don't want to subscribe to everything.

Another point to make is that a lot of forumNG functionality is implemented using the 'ForumNG feature' sub-plugin type. By default there is a lot of functionality, and if you don't need it all, you could remove some sub-plugins. (Some of the sub-plugins are quite specific to how the OU does things. We recognise that.)

Average of ratings: Useful (2)
In reply to Tim Hunt

Re: Moodle Forums......

by Mark Andrews -

Hi all,

 

Some interesting comments in here; regarding forumNG, advanced forums, various functionalities, accessibility and usability etc…. All of which bring me back to my original question: 

'is there a tangible development plan for the moodle forums?'

Based on the discussion it seems not. But there does seem to be people with ideas, and some with solutions.

So I guess the next question is:

How to move this forward? - should we be looking to simply update the current forum tool with the advancements in forumNG, Advanced forums and other developments or look to build a new tool that takes these factors into account plus adds some best practice functionalities from forum(esq) tools from the web.

Thoughts, ideas?

Cheers

Mark

 PS. We're meeting with Catalyst IT later this week to discuss the technicalities of the 'reading list' functionality, perhaps when we have a technical design we can post here for comment/discussion.

In reply to Mark Andrews

Re: Moodle Forums......

by Mark Andrews -

Hello,

Earlier in this thread I outlined some bookmarking forum post functionality that we we're planning on having developed. To close the loop I thought I would post an update.

We now have the first iteration of this tool live for our participants initial indications seem to show it's going to be useful. I'd be keen to hear if others would find this useful, or how it could be further development enhanced - would it even be useful for core inclusion?

Regards

Mark

Average of ratings: Useful (1)
In reply to Mark Andrews

Re: Moodle Forums......

by Derek Chirnside -

The bookmarks Mark?  Did they ever get finished?  Are they available as a plugin?

-Derek

In reply to Derek Chirnside

Re: Moodle Forums......

by Mark Andrews -

Hi Derek,

Yes it did - hopefully the demo video higher up in the thread shows it in action. We were really quite pleased with how it works.

I understand the development was a local plugin but did require an additional line into core so I guess would not be a neat plugin. However, my recollection was that if forums implemented renderers then it would be possible to make it a 'clean' plugin.

We did discuss at the time submitting it to core, but, unfortunately i'm not sure if that happened. I've left that role so doubt if I would be able push it any further forward.

However, if it's felt that this could make contact and see if there would be the possibility of this.

Apologizes for my slightly unclear comment.


Best

Mark