- Does anyone have a solid experience if the version V2.3.2. generates bottlenecks on one of the three layers?
- Someone tested in large installations the Moodle Universal Cache (MUC) effectiveness in version 2.4?
We have been running 2.3.1+ in production since August and have been running 2.3.2+ since Oct 5th. Our Moodle installation doesn't have as many users, ~70k, and we run on 1 webserver and 1 DB. Here are more details:
I beleive the MUC is still waiting integration, see MDL-34224. I would be interested in helping test the MUC. It looks like Tim Barker is working on developing a test procedure for the MUC for 2.4, see MDLTEST-328.
2.0 was a beta version in all but name, so I think getting out of that is probably a good idea.
We recently did load testing for 2.3 which actually showed a slight performance increase since 2.2, but we don't have comparisons for 2.0. (So far, 2.4 is slower again.
Thx Visvanath !
my 90K users are employee so active users (minimum 10 courses per year) and in critical situation 6,5K concurrent users. With our actual HW architecture and Moodle Version the performance it's superlative but before to move in Moodle 2.3 I want to understand if necessary change HW Architecture to maintain the same performance.
Hi Humanage SRL,
The number of users and concurrent users you mentioned are similar to like ours. And you also said that performance is superlative. Pls post here hardware architecture and configuration for our guidance.
Internet Explorer v 8
Linux Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 64bit
Apache Application Server v 2.2.3
PHP v 5.3.3
Oracle v 10.2.0.5