Hi Dan
You wrote:
> [IMO] Certainly not! Moodle HQ are not the only people contributing major functionality to Moodle core.
You are right. Still HQ decides which comes into the core.
Let's call those successful contributions "official".
> Helen mentioned one of the catalysts for this forum was feedback from Andrew/Ruslan at LUNS not being able to get community feedback for the major features they contributed to Moodle 2.3.
I see. That must be the "popular request" Helen was talking of in the "Moodle design" forum
http://moodle.org/mod/forum/discuss.php?d=211864.
> Personally, I would like to see this forum limited to those projects which are intended to get into at Moodle core. In order to have focus and allow each topic to have the attention it deserves.
Sure. It should be the breeding ground for future kings and queens - not a green mile. The only catch - the guardians must have foresight!
> What are 'official' projects anyway?
Can we agree on the definition I derived from your first sentence?