Hi, I just started working with mnet and have successfully gotten 2 instances working together nicely however, one thing I have just noticed is that there are now 2 instances of each user in the list of participants on our 2nd instance. I realize a 2nd account is being created. Is there any way around this problem?
Válasz erre: Susan Mangan
Re: Displaying 2 sets of names in list of participants
Susan Mangan írta időpontban
anyone..?
Válasz erre: Susan Mangan
Re: Displaying 2 sets of names in list of participants
John Andrewartha írta időpontban
Mnet is both a inta Moodle networking protocal and a enrolment method.
When a student networks from one Moodle to another there profile is also transfered. Even if they have a native account on the second Moodle.
When you look at the users as a admin or manager (Moodle 2*) you can for cases as above, see 2 instances or the same student/user. The one that has the Allow/Deny is the Mnet one.
Thats about as clear as mud, I think.
Válasz erre: John Andrewartha
Re: Displaying 2 sets of names in list of participants
Susan Mangan írta időpontban
So is there any way around this? It's just not Admin that see's the additional accounts. In some case there are 3 instances of the same user (teacher or student) in the participants' list. I'm just wondering if I am doing something wrong...
Válasz erre: Susan Mangan
Re: Displaying 2 sets of names in list of participants
John Andrewartha írta időpontban
Look at your Mnet topography. It sounds like have something like this.
A >> B B >>C C>>A meaning that the remote Moodles can roam between each other. That would account for multiple entries.
What you need is Gateway (SSO) A >> B A >> C B & C can't roam between each other.
When you log out from a B or C it will take you back to your gateway A.
By turning the inter roaming off it may fix the multiples. Not guaranteed.
Válasz erre: John Andrewartha
Re: Displaying 2 sets of names in list of participants
Susan Mangan írta időpontban
hmmm... so you can't set this up with just 2 instances, you would need a third?