The API will be in a .dll format and will be available for software developers to write custom moodle clients (I haven't looked much into the server side aspect of it yet).
I am curious if anybody actually needs this or thinks it's a good idea, as i'm getting pretty bored of developing it to be honest.
Here is a picture which shows a small console application I made with my moodle API (You can see I am testing it with moodle.hrc.ac.uk however it has worked with all other moodle websites I have tested as well).
Below is a link to a header file in C++ which shows the small amount of features there are:
Moodle Header
(Of course a lot of the debugging functions in there won't actually be exported in the final build). The TCPClient class is a basic class I created for convenience (which is used for communication with the moodle web server).
Please tell me if you need it as I am really not motivated to complete this...
Are you connecting directly to the Moodle DB, and replicating Moodle's PHP code in C++. That sounds like a really bad idea to me.
If your C++ code is calling Moodle web services, then there is nothing wrong with that.
I know the problem with this is that if people modify their moodle a lot it could cause compatibility issues, but if I got support then I'm sure I could setup a basic template for compatibility with it.
Would be better to use real web services, when they are available in Moodle 2.0.
So if you haven't started you ready to? I'm interested and we're past 2.2 now.
Brandon,
I haven't seen anything about this API, but have you looked at LTI provider that allows links between all sorts of systems?
I don't know if it's what you are looking for, but Gavin Henrick did a great presentation on it at the recent iMoot and I'm sure there's something on his blog you may find useful if you are interested in this. It may have superceded what was originally being talked about here and the need for moodle specific API, I'm not sure?
http://www.somerandomthoughts.com/blog/2012/01/08/review-lti-provider-for-moodle-2-2/
Richard
Thank you, I wasn't aware of this feature. Unfortunately it’s still Basic LTI. Need to look more into this but it show the best promise but if still in Basic LTI what kind of capability do you really have. This does remind me of StackExchanges API, but I still need more clarity on some topics.
.dll is inherantly bug infested programming, I guess debugging will be the challenge you face. Well if you need help in testing stage
I can spare a few "free minutes happy programming!!