Hi Mary
yes I know that I am treading in dangerous waters with the whole fluid vs fixed width debate.
I am yet to be convinced completely that fluid is best - although I do know that there is a large community of designers that say categorically "it is"!
I also know that there are many users (like me) who, selfishly, want to ensure the content is displayed as designed no matter what resolution (like a PDF), even if the scaling is higher (I know I know For example, the video content I am displaying won't change scale, so if the browser does, it looks lost flating around in the page with too much whitespace.
I am - for right or wrong - and I can feel the big guns groaning there way to point in my direction while I type - that immitation of some of the best fixed-width sites out there (bbc.co.uk for one) is a safe enough bet for me until I can properly compare my site on the various monitors around.
Also, bear in mind that many end-users (in my case doctors) are working on low-capacity hospital machines, not the 2000x1024 monitors that you and I are spoilt with. Those that do have the massive resolution monitors by now have probably realised that even their Word documents are looking a tad on the squinty side so have adjusted them appropriately (I have!) and that you really don't have to open out your browser to fill the screen, then whine that it doesn't look great )
Oh god, I've done it now, right ? (:-o
Andrew